Sunday, January 6, 2013

Survey of Pharmacy Law Available from NABP

Serving as a convenient reference source for individuals seeking an overview of the laws and regulations that govern pharmacy practice in 53 jurisdictions, the updated 2013 Survey of Pharmacy Law is now available. 
The Survey, produced in a CD format, consists of four sections including a state-by-state overview of organizational law, licensing law, drug law, and census data. Newly added this year, a question in Section 18, Drug Control Regulations, asks what quantity limits are imposed for controlled substances. In addition, a new question was added to Section 19, Drug Product Selection Laws, and asks if the state has any interchangeability requirements for biosimilars/biologics. 
Updates for the 2013 Survey were graciously provided by the state boards of pharmacy. In addition to the boards’ support, NABP requested data from relevant health care associations for the Survey’s prescribing authority and dispensing authority laws in Sections 24 and 25, and laws pertaining to the possession of non-controlled legend drugs and possession of controlled substances in Sections 26 and 27. Organizations that provided this data include the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists and the American Optometric Association. 
The Survey can be purchased online for $195 by visiting the Publications section of the NABP Web site at www.nabp.net/publications/survey-of-pharmacy-law/
NABP provides the Survey of Pharmacy Law to schools and colleges of pharmacy for distribution free of charge to their final-year pharmacy students. This is made possible through the generous grant of Purdue Pharma L.P. 
For more information on the Survey, please contact Custome

FDA to HOLD PUBLIC HEARING ON USE OF OPIOID PAIN MEDICATION on FEBRUARY 7-8, 2013

As FDA continues to seek a balance between minimizing opioid drug abuse and enabling the appropriate treatment of pain, the agency will hold a two-day public hearing to obtain information, such as scientific evidence and study data, on issues related to opioid use. At the hearing, to take place February 7-8, 2013, FDA seeks to obtain information from expert members of the public on the following topics:
  • Diagnosis and Understanding of Patient Pain
  • Understanding and Adhering to the Labels of Pain-Treating Products
  • Limiting Opioid Prescription and Use
Those wishing to attend must register by January 18, 2013. Additional details and instructions for submitting written comments are available in a Federal Register notice

Ohio Pharmacy Board asked that Avella (formally known as The Apothecary Shop), cease compounding Testosterone Cypionate.

For more information see here

National Association Community Pharmacist's Association: Who's Protecting Your Right To Compound

To view this Powerpoint notes handout from 2010 click here

1099 vs. W-2 Sales Reps in the Compound World

For a discussion and various viewpoints regarding 1099 vs. W-2 Sales Reps plus percents of commission, visit the CafePharma Message Board found here

Some Chatter About OPC, Franklin, Russellville in Alabama

There is a lot of chatter going on on the Cafepharma message board, including mention of a pharmacist working in Russellville at the time of the FBI raid in August who was found dead of a gunshot. To view this message board, click here

Saturday, January 5, 2013

MASSACHUSETTS PLANS SOME OF STRICTEST CONTROLS OF COMPOUNDING PHARMACIES IN USA

Posted on 

The laws will be among the strongest in the country, said Kevin Outterson, a law professor at Boston University and a member of the expert panel that advised the state on how to curb abuses by companies like the New England Compounding Center, the Framingham pharmacy that made the tainted drug responsible for the nationwide meningitis outbreak.
The legislation would establish strict licensing requirements for compounding sterile drugs; let the state assess fines against pharmacies that break its rules; protect whistle-blowers who work in compounding pharmacies; and reorganize the state pharmacy board to include more members who are independent of the industry and fewer who are part of it.
Alec Loftus, a spokesman for the state’s Office of Health and Human Services, said that Mr. Patrick expected the new legislation to be passed quickly.
Daniel Carpenter, a professor of government at Harvard, said the proposed laws seemed sound and comprehensive. But he warned that if other states did not take similar steps, compounding pharmacies engaging in shoddy practices would just move to places with the weakest laws and the least oversight.
“The remaining question is not what Massachusetts is doing or will do, but will there be a minimum level of regulation like this in the rest of the states?” Professor Carpenter said.
The meningitis outbreak, first detected in September, was caused by contaminated batches of a steroid, methylprednisolone acetate, made by the New England Compounding Center. The drug was injected into about 14,000 people’s spinal area to treat back and neck pain.
As of Dec. 28, 656 people in 19 states had become ill with meningitis or other infections, like severe internal abscesses in the area where the drug was injected. Some have had both meningitis and spinal infections. The case count is expected to keep rising. Thirty-nine have died.
The New England Compounding Center was shut down, and inspections found extensive contamination. Investigations uncovered a long history of questionable practices that had drawn warnings from the state and the Food and Drug Administration.
r
On Dec. 21, the company announced that it had filed for bankruptcy. Numerous lawsuits have been filed against it.
At the heart of the problem have been gaps in regulation that have allowed such companies to avoid both state and federal controls. The company called itself a pharmacy, and pharmacies are generally regulated by states, while large drug companies are regulated federally, by the Food and Drug Administration.
Compounding pharmacies mix their own drug preparations, like skin creams and cough syrups, supposedly for individual patients with special needs. But the New England Compounding Center began to act like a manufacturer, making and shipping large amounts of injectable drugs, for which sterility is essential. No state law equired it to obtain a license for this type of large-scale compounding, to follow good manufacturing processes or to let the state know it was shipping all over the country.
Dr. Lauren Smith, interim commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, said the company “was a manufacturer in pharmacy clothing.”
Governor Patrick said, “The tragic meningitis outbreak has shown us all that the board’s governing authority has not kept up with an industry that has evolved from corner drugstores to the types of large manufacturers that have been at the center of so much harm.”
Dr. Smith said she thought the most important part of the new legislation was the requirement of a license for sterile compounding. “Now we are going to have the ability to develop specialty licenses that will allow us to track and identify those pharmacies that are engaged in different practices that could potentially put higher numbers of individuals at risk, such as those who engage in sterile compounding,” she said.
Professor Carpenter said a particularly powerful part of the proposal is that it requires licensure for out-of-state pharmacies that ship medication to Massachusetts. The state, he said, is a huge market for injectable drugs.“Basically, if you think about the large hospitals, the amount of medical care that goes on in the state, it’s in a sense using the purchasing power of the state of Massachusetts to induce changes elsewhere,” he said.
The state has also taken other steps recently to rein in compounding, apart from the new legislation. It began conducting surprise inspections, and has required compounding pharmacies to report how much medication they are shipping and where, so that it can keep tabs on those that begin acting like manufacturers. It also requires the pharmacies to report when they become subjects of regulatory actions by other states or the federal government.
Abby Goodnough reported from Boston, and Denise Grady from New York.

More countries added to list of viewers

Add Azerbaijan and Serbia to the list of countries viewing the blog.


Algeria
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cayman Islands
Canada
China
Columbia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
France
Gabon
Germany
Hong Kong
Honduras
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Kenya
Latvia
Macedonia
Malaysia
Mongolia
Morocco
Mexico
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand
Nigeria
Pakistan
Panama
Philippines
Poland
Romania
Puerto Rico
Peru
Portugal
Russia
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Trinidad & Tobago
Turkey
Turks and Cacaos
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay 
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zimbabwe

Some Tough Questions to Answers: Is Pharmacy Really Pharmacy? Should Veterinary (Animal) Compounding Rules Be Different From Medical (Human) Compounding?

One of my friends has at times said Pharmacy is Pharmacy and the same rules apply whether it is veterinary compounding or medical compounding.  But should this be true?  Should there be different rules for each or should the rules be the same?  Should a pharmacy be allowed to just do veterinary compounding because they view it to have less liability issue because not as many people question if an animal dies as they do if a human dies. Plus no one tracks the animal deaths caused by bad compounding.  People notice when 21 horses die at one time, but how about when one cat dies at a time over a year from bad compounding?  Who is keeping track of that?  Who is even noticing?  So shouldn't every compounder be required to compound both human and animal drugs in order to ensure top notch standards?  What do you think?

In Ohio Compounding pharmacies face new scrutiny


Posted: Saturday, January 5, 2013 12:00 pm | Updated: 5:02 pm, Fri Jan 4, 2013.
LIMA — The facility responsible for the deadly meningitis outbreak in late 2012 was known as a “compounding pharmacy.” However, that Massachusetts facility was a commercial prescription manufacturer, and in reality comparing it to a true compounding pharmacy would be like comparing a mass-food producer with someone cooking in his kitchen. Still, the problems found at the New England Compounding Center have meant increased scrutiny for small compounding pharmacies that mix ingredients for a single prescription. A new report released in December by the National Conference of State Legislatures said several states changed laws regarding regulation of compounding pharmacies and locally, pharmacists report increased inspections.
“You can expect something like that to come out of any event. If there’s an oil spill, everyone gets a closer look,” said John Pack, owner of Pack Pharmacy, which is Lima’s only compounding pharmacy.
Pack said compounding is more complicated than regular pharmacy work.
“We’re doing more, and more is expected of us. People need reassured,” Pack said. “So, two weeks ago, we had the most thorough inspection I’ve ever experienced. It was a surprise visit. You know, business just stops for them. But, it was very positive. We had nothing at fault. They did some educational things; they’re trying to get a more consistent way of keeping records.”
continue reading here

Compounding pharmacies in cross hairs - Health-Science - The Times-Tribune

Compounding pharmacies in cross hairs - Health-Science - The Times-Tribune

North Carolina's Involvement in National Pharmacy Compounding Efforts

Involvement in National Pharmacy
Compounding Efforts
Board staff is working closely with National Association
of Boards of Pharmacy® (NABP®) staff on the NABP compounding action plan, a broad-gauge national effort aimed at
supporting state boards of pharmacy in providing effective
oversight of compounding pharmacy practices.
In addition, committees in both the US Senate and US House
of Representatives have convened to analyze the causes of the
NECC tragedy and to explore potential federal regulation in the
area of pharmacy compounding. In response to requests from
these committees, Board staff provided substantial information
on North Carolina’s regulation of pharmacy compounding.

Quotation from North Carolina's Board of Pharmacy's January 2013 Newsletter found here

North Carolina Board of Pharmacy Steps Up Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies

Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies
Stepped Up
Board staff has stepped up inspections of North Carolina
pharmacies that specialize in compounding to ensure compliance with relevant law. In addition, Board staff is collecting
information from out-of-state pharmacies permitted in North
Carolina that specialize in compounding for the same purpose.
Already, Board inspectors have noted another uptick in the
compounding of “over-the-counter” drugs for general resale.
This is not a legal practice. This activity was the subject of
a lengthy item in the April 2008 Newsletter: www.ncbop.org/
Newsletters/Apr2008.pdf. Given the clarity of the law and
Board staff’s repeated emphasis on this issue, instances of this
practice will no longer be treated as an “educational” matter.
They will be treated as a disciplinary matter.

Quotation found in Jan. 2013 North Carolina Board of Pharmacy Newsletter found here

North Carolina Pharmacy Compounding Working Group

The Pharmacy Compounding Working Group
The Board has also created, empaneled, and charged a Pharmacy
Compounding Working Group to conduct a comprehensive review of
 all aspects of compounding pharmacy regulation
including (1) whether and to what extent changes are needed in
either or both of the North Carolina Pharmacy Practice Act and
Board of Pharmacy rules governing compounding pharmacy;
(2) whether and to what extent United States Pharmacopeia
Chapter <797> standards should be specifically incorporated
into state law; (3) whether and to what extent North Carolina
law should mandate or recognize any form of “accreditation”
for compounding pharmacies; (4) whether and to what extent
changes are needed in Board investigator training or inspection
methods with respect to compounding pharmacies; and
(5) what particular issues, if any, with respect to out-of-state
compounding pharmacies, require different or additional regulatory
approaches. Each of these broad topics will encompass
numerous subsidiary issues. The working group will provide a
report and recommendation to the full Board on these issues.

Quoted from North Carolina Board of Pharmacy January 2013 Newsletter found here

North Carolina's Immediate Response to the NECC-Caused Fungal Meningitis Outbreak

The Board’s Immediate Response to the
NECC-Caused Fungal Meningitis Outbreak
The Board summarily suspended NECC’s out-of-state
pharmacy permit on October 3, 2012, one hour after receiving
confirmation that NECC products were suspected in the fungal
meningitis outbreak.
Board investigative staff cooperated closely with North Carolina Division of Public Health staff to visit and/or telephone
every clinic in North Carolina identified as having received
potentially contaminated methylprednisolone products from
NECC. The Board staff specifically thanks Amanda Fuller
Moore and her staff at the Division of Public Health for their
superb efforts. During these in-person and telephone contacts,
Board and Division of Public Health staff ensured that the clinics were aware of the recall, had removed NECC products from
inventory, and were notifying potentially affected patients.
When the NECC recall was extended to all sterile products
produced by that pharmacy, Board investigative staff again
cooperated closely with Division of Public Health staff to ensure that all affected clinics had pulled every NECC product
from inventory and were notifying patients as recommended
by Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Immediately upon learning that FDA had urged Ameridose
to recall all compounded products produced at that facility, the
Board members summarily suspended Ameridose’s out-of-state
pharmacy permits.

Quoted from January 2013 edition of North Carolina Board of Pharmacy Newsletter found here

Copy of Proposed Legislation in Massachusetts

To view click here

Expert: Pharmacy overhaul not enough

Jan. 5, 2013
 
Richard Weir / Boston Herald

 

Gov. Deval Patrick’s planned overhaul of the state Board of Pharmacy — a move aimed at boosting oversight of sterile compounding pharmacies after a deadly nationwide fungal meningitis outbreak — is a “great first step” but further action is needed, according to an expert on pharmaceutical compounding.
“I think it’s moving in the right 
direction,” said Sarah Sellers, a former U.S. Food and Drug Administration official who worked on compliance issues involving compounding and has become a crusader. “But (the measures) will not be enough to protect the public without additional 
efforts by the FDA.”
Until federal law changes, Sellers said, states like Massachusetts can help protect the public by posting the inspection findings of such pharmacies online.
 
“Transparency can be a very effective regulation tool … and an 
efficient way to rein in inappropriate practices,” she said.
Continue reading here

Proposed Compounding Bill in Massachuetts Would change Composition of State Pharmacy Board to Include Others Than Pharmacists!!

The recently proposed bill in Massachuetts would change the composition of the state Pharmacy Board, which is dominated by registered pharmacists, and provide for the appointment of a registered nurse, a physician, a pharmacy technician and three public members. It would make board members subject to financial disclosure requirements.

New drug compounding law proposed in Massachusetts

In the wake of a fungal meningitis outbreakthat has taken the lives of 14 Tennesseans, the governor of Massachusetts Friday proposed multiple changes in state laws and regulations governing compounding pharmacies, including the one blamed for the ongoing public health crisis.
Gov. Deval Patrick’s proposal, based in part on the recommendations of a special commission, would change the composition of the state board that licensed the New England Compounding Center and give the panel increased powers to regulate all compounding pharmacies located in Massachusetts or shipping drugs into Massachusetts from other states.
Continue reading here

Friday, January 4, 2013

Reminder: Public comment's on pharmacy compounding Due to FDA by Jan. 18, 2013

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is inviting public comment through Jan. 18, 2013, on a framework for pharmacy compounding. The FDA is soliciting comments on several specific questions related to federal and state roles in the regulation of pharmacy compounding, such as (1) whether the states currently are able to provide oversight of pharmacy compounding and consumer protection; (2) what the federal role should be in regulating higher risk pharmacy compounding such as compounding high-volumes of drugs for interstate distribution; and (3) whether or not there is a role for the states in enforcing a federal standard for "nontraditional" compounding. Comments are due by January 18, 2013.

Another Recommended Read: Pharmacy compounding primer for physicians: prescriber beware.

Pharmacy compounding primer for physicians: prescriber beware.

q-Vigilance LLC, North Barrington, IL, USA.
Drugs (impact factor: 4.23). 10/2012; 72(16):2043-50. DOI:10.2165/11640850-000000000-00000
 

ABSTRACT

Since the development of federal standards for drug approval, the practice of medicine has historically involved the compounding of medications based on a physician's determination that a US FDA-approved product either did not exist, or could not be used for medical reasons. Today, prescriptions for non-FDA-approved compounded drugs may be driven by fanciful and largely unregulated pharmacy advertisements to physicians and patients and/or payer reimbursement policies, thus placing prescribers in the backseat for clinical decision making. This article outlines essential differences between FDA-approved drugs and compounded drugs and reasserts the primary medical role of physicians for determining what medical circumstances may necessitate treatment with non-FDA-approved products. In addition, liability concerns when prescribing non-FDA-approved drugs are discussed. While representing a US perspective, underlying principles apply globally in the setting of magistral and extemporaneous formulations produced outside national regulatory frameworks.
Source: PubMed

Veterinary pharmacy practice: you can do it.

Debora S Chan, Veterinary Pharmacy Practice: You can do it, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association: JAPhA (impact factor: 1.48). 44(5):532, is a recommended read for those in the veteirnary pharmacy practice.

Compounding for animal patients: contemporary issues.

Department of Pharmacy Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association: JAPhA (impact factor: 1.48). 44(3):375-84; quiz 384-6.
 

ABSTRACT

To provide background information relating to the growth observed in veterinary compounding, discuss positive contributions made to animal health via compounding, present compounding practices that are in the best interest of patient care, present documents available to pharmacists to use for guidance when practicing veterinary pharmacy, and emphasize the need for education among stakeholders on the subject of veterinary compounding.
The Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act of 1994, compliance policy guide section 608.400, the American Veterinary Medical Association Position Statement on Compounding and Extralabel Drug Use Algorithm; supporting data from veterinary and pharmacy literature documenting the practice of veterinary compounding are referenced (SilverPlatter Medline 1966-2002 and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts; 1970 through December 2002; no restrictions; search terms, veterinary AND compounding).
By the author.
By the author.
Requests for compounding of products for veterinary uses are common in community pharmacy, and these preparations fill many clinical, dosing, and drug-administration needs in the care of companion animals. However, like other elements of pharmacy compounding, preparation of veterinary products falls into a legally gray area that is the subject of current scrutiny by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Pharmacists involved in this practice should keep the best interests of the animal in mind; recognize limitations about safety, effectiveness, and stability of compounded formulations; and avoid preparing products similar in ingredients and purpose as commercially available, FDA-approved products. Situations in which compounding becomes manufacturing invites enforcement action by FDA. The dispensing of compounded products should be based on a valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship and comply with federal acts, FDA's compounding compliance policy guide, and other such resources.
All pharmacists and pharmacies engaged in any type of veterinary pharmacy practice must be aware of the contemporary issues facing their profession. Best patient care practices, education, and open communication among stakeholders will play a critical role in the practice and future regulation of veterinary compounding.
Source: PubMed

What Did FDA Miss At New England Compounding?

By Ed Silverman
 Two months ago, the FDA inspected the New England Compounding Center, the pharmacy that has been linked to 590 cases of fungal meningitis, including 37 deaths (see this), and found a variety of disturbing conditions. These included ‘greenish-black foreign matter’ on sterilization equipment and air conditioning that was turned off each night despite the need to control room temperatures (back story with link to FDA report).
Similarly, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health conducted its own inspection in October and ran across some of the same things, such as a leaking boiler adjacent to the a clean room and wet floor surfaces, including a “tacky mat” that were soiled with black debris (here is the state report).
Nonetheless, more than a dozen people who have filed federal lawsuits against the NECC, which is located alongside a recycling plant that is owned by one of the two individuals who also run the compounder, received permission from a judge to conduct their own inspection (here is the order). Why? The plaintiffs believe the regulators may have missed some important pieces of evidence.
In an affidavit filed in the litigation, Tom Irmiter of Forensic Building Science, who has been retained by the plaintiffs to conduct the inspection, maintains there is no evidence that the FDA and state inspectors examined the overall condition of the building as a potential contributor to the contamination. And so he proposes to dissect the walls, ceiling, roof and foundation (here is the affidavit).
“Here’s an entity undergoing tremendous turmoil. We believe the preliminary (state) report that was issued is missing some things that may yield some other signs,” says Mark Zamora, an attorney for Chad Green, who claims he developed a joint infection and abscess due to an NECC medicine. “The FDA conducted testing of the vials, a baseline test for contaminants in May and released an eight-page inspection and observation report, which I think candidly revealed an overwhelmed agency struggling to come with an outbreak.
“But no one has access to raw data and we think they missed some things. For example, the garbage dump is yards from the facility. They didn’t examine the HVAC. We’re concerned with what may be found in the clean room. I think they did a decent job of explaining source contamination of product itself. But for us, we want to know how how did the material get in the vials? And if it’s the vial, did it come from the company that supplied the product or from the company that made the finished product?”
Such a move is predictable, but could also yield some interesting clues that might underscore the need for modifying regulatory inspections. As the attorney notes, the existence of contamination is obviously a key element of any inspection, but learning how the contamination occurred is equally crucial. A leaky boiler and the failure to use air conditioning may have been culprits here, but maybe there is more to the story.
Story found here