Sunday, September 9, 2012

The FDA's Position on Dispensing Veterinary Prescription Drugs and Labeling and Script Requirements

Dispensing Veterinary Prescription Drugs

Since adequate directions for safe and effective lay use cannot be written for animal prescription drug products, such products can only be sold on the prescription or other order of a licensed veterinarian (Section 503(f)). Prior to being sold or dispensed, they must remain in the possession of a person or firm regularly and lawfully engaged in the manufacture, transportation, storage, or wholesale or retail distribution of animal prescription drug products. The drug products may be distributed only by persons or firms authorized by State and local laws.
Sale (dispensing, shipping, or otherwise making available for use in animals) of an animal prescription drug product to the layperson may be made only by or on the bona fide prescription or other order of a licensed veterinarian. Sale of a animal prescription drug product to a layperson, except on a prescription or on order of a licensed practitioner, causes the product to be misbranded and subjects the seller to civil and/or criminal provisions of the Act.
A licensed veterinarian may legally use or dispense an animal prescription drug product only within the course of his/her professional practice where a valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship exists. Veterinarians employed by drug manufacturers or distributors may not legally dispense prescription drug products to laypersons unless they meet the above criteria. Similarly, practicing veterinarians or their employees may not legally sell animal prescription drug products to walk-in customers unless the same criteria are met. Federal regulations require that drug manufacturers provide at least the following information on the label of the finished package form of animal prescription drug products:
What information needs to be on the package label of animal Rx drugs?
  • the statement, "Caution: Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian;"
  • recommended or usual dosage;
  • route of administration, if it is not for oral use;
  • quantity or proportion of each active ingredient as well as the information required by section 502(e) of the Act;
  • names of inactive ingredients if it is for other than oral use;
  • an identifying lot or control number from which it is possible to determine the complete manufacturing history of the drug.
What needs to be included in the veterinarian’s prescription and included on the label of the dispensed product?
  • name and address of the dispenser;
  • serial number and date of the order or its filling;
  •  name and address of the veterinarian who prescribed or ordered the drug product;
  • directions for use; and
  • any necessary warning and precautionary statements including withdrawal times.
Any additional requirements of State or local laws for dispensed animal drug products must also be followed.
To protect themselves and their clients, veterinarians should make efforts to ensure their instructions are followed, especially when they prescribe or recommend drugs for food-producing animals that require a withdrawal period.

AAEP's 58th Annual Convention

The AAEP's 58th Annual Convention, See It All: Deeper Insights Into Equine Medicine will be held December 1-5, 2012 in Anaheim, California.  There are a number of topics during this convention, but listed below are a few:


Ethics, Scope of Practice, and Racing
Moderator: Reynolds Cowles, Jr.
Sponsored by Merial, maker of GASTROGARD® (omeprazole).

1:30Regulation of Veterinary Medicine  Stephen S. Galloway
1:55Decisions That Matter: The Complementary Roles of Law, Morals, and Ethics in Equine Practice  F. Richard Lesser
2:20Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Veterinary Practice in a Pari-Mutuel Environment  Scott E. Palmer
2:40Ethical Issues for the Racetrack Practitioner: A Daily Requirement  Jeff A. Blea
3:00VCPR: Racing  Jeff A. Blea; Sport Horse/Surgery/Ambulatory  Karen A. Nyrop; Pleasure/Broodmare  F. Richard Lesser;VCPR Overview - Harry W. Werner
3:20Panel for Case-Based Discussion 

Moderator: Reynolds Cowles, Jr.
Panelists: Jeff A. Blea, Stephen S. Galloway, F. Richard Lesser, Karen A. Nyrop, Scott E. Palmer, and Kim Volle


For more information and to view registration, click here.






 

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Compliance with USP Standards for Media-fill testing is required in Virginia

Compliance with USP Standards for
Compounding
Media-fill testing is required when performing low, medium,
and high-risk level compounding of compounded sterile preparations
 (CSPs). USP35-NF30 states:
Media-Fill Test Procedure – This test or an equivalent
test is performed at least annually by each person
authorized to compound in a low-risk level environment
under conditions that closely simulate the most
challenging or stressful conditions encountered during
compounding of low-risk level CSPs. Once begun,
this test is completed without interruption. Quality
assurance procedures for medium-risk level CSPs
include all those for low-risk level CSPs, as well as
a more challenging media-fill test passed annually
or more frequently. In addition, a media-fill test that
represents high-risk level compounding is performed
semiannually by each person authorized to compound
high-risk level CSPs. 
On June 12, 2012, the Board approved changes to Guidance
Document 110-36. The terms “annually” and “semiannually”
as used in United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapters 795 and
797 are defined to mean every 12 months and every six months,
respectively. Records associated with annual and semiannual
requirements shall be maintained for two years from the date
performed. Such records may be maintained in off-site storage
or as an electronic image that provides an exact image of the
document that is clearly legible provided such off-site or electronic
storage is retrievable and made available for inspection or
audit within 48 hours of a request by the Board or an authorized
agent. Board of Pharmacy guidance documents are available at
www.dhp.virginia.gov/Pharmacy/pharmacy_guidelines.htm.

New Compounding Rules Will Be Effective in January 2015 in North Dakota

Pharmacy Inspections
It is the time of the year for pharmacy inspections to occur. By the time this Newsletter gets to you, inspections for most pharmacies will be complete. For those of you still waiting, as a reminder, the emphasis of the inspections this year will include:
♦ Use and compliance of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
♦ Counseling or offer to counsel on all prescriptions by the pharmacist
♦ CII controlled substance audit: one done before the inspector arrives
and one during inspection
♦ Information on new hospital first dose review rule effective June
2015
♦ Information on new compounding rules effective January 2015

Taken from the September 2012 Newsletter found here.
These are the rules that must be complied with by 2015 here.

New Mexico Board of Pharmacy is Considering Amendment to Dangerous Veterinary Drugs-Retail Distribution

During the August 27, 2012, New Mexico Board of Pharmacy meeting, the board considered an amendment to 16.19.15 regarding Dispensing Dangerous Veterinary Drugs-Retail Distribution.  The minutes to that meetings can be viewed here.  The red lined version of the amendment can be viewed here.

New Jersey Board of Pharmacy Takes AVMA Letter as Informational Only

The July 2012 New Jersey Board of Pharmacy  meeting minutes contain the following entry:

American Veterinary Medical Association - Consulting Veterinarians on appropriate prescription choices for their animal patients. The Board reviewed and discussed the letter. Since there were no specific accusations, the Board accepted this as informational only.

New Hampshire Board of Pharmacy Takes Letter From AVMA Letter Under Advisement

During August 15, 2012, New Hampshire Board of Pharmacy meeting, the board took under advisement the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Letter to Board President
Manoukian.   See agenda here.  It appears that these letters from the AVMA went out to a number if not all the state boards of pharmacy.  

NPI Number and Veterinarians in Nevada

From the Nevada Board of Pharmacy Newsletter found here.

NPI Number and Veterinarians
It has been reported to the Nevada State Board of Pharmacy that some pharmacies are refusing to fill prescriptions written by a veterinarian simply because the veterinarian has no National Provider Identifier (NPI) number. Please be aware that a veterinarian is not required to obtain an NPI number. The NPI number applies only to health care providers covered under Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act who bill Medicare. Obviously, veterinarians are not billing Medicare!

Maine Board of Pharmacy Agrees to Work On Role of Pharmacists in The Dispensing of Pet Medication

The Maine Board of Pharmacy during its August 2, 2012 meeting  agreed the pharmacy board would collaborate with the American Veterinary Medical Association regarding the roles of pharmacists in the dispensing of pet medication.   This was based on a letter dated June 29, 2012, from Rene Carlson of the American Veterinary Medical Association.  The minutes from this meeting can be viewed here

Kansas Board of Pharmacy to Discuss Dispensing of Animal Prescriptions

The Kansas Board of Pharmacy is scheduled to discuss the dispensing of animal prescriptions during its September 13-14, 2012 board meeting.  This topic is currently on the agenda to be discussed on September 13th at 2:20.  The agenda can be found here.

Kansas Board of Pharmacy Disciplinary Records

Kansas Board of Pharmacy disciplinary records for both pharmacies and pharmacists can be viewed here.

Deleware Board of Pharmacy Disciplinary Records

The Deleware Board of Pharmacy disciplinary records can be found here.

Colorado Board of Pharmacy Disciplinary Action

The Colorado Board of Pharmacy Disciplinary Action can be viewed here.  The actions are arranged by month and year.

Arizona Board of Pharmacist Disciplinary Action

The Arizona Board of Pharmacy has  its disciplinary actions located here.  The website is easy to use if you know the name of the pharmacist who was disciplined or the case number of the action.

FDA Issues Warning Letter to Eli Lilly and Company Regarding Imaging Compound Amyvid

On Sept. 6, 2012, the FDA issued a letter sent to Eli Lilly and Company regarding a web page for PET imaging compound Amyvid. The letter reads:

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring, MD 20993
Josephine Secnik, MS, MBA Director, Global Regulatory Affairs– U.S. Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis, Indiana 46285
RE: NDA #202008
Amyvid™ (Florbetapir F 18 Injection) for intravenous use
MA #9
Dear Ms. Secnik:
As part of its routine monitoring and surveillance program, the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP), Division of Professional Drug Promotion (DPDP) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed a webpage (AM77988) for Amyvid™ (Florbetapir F 18 Injection) (Amyvid), submitted by Eli Lilly and Company’s (Eli Lilly) under cover of Form FDA-2253. This webpage includes a misleading multi-colored image of the brain. Additionally, OPDP has been made aware that these misleading images appeared in the commercial exhibit hall of the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting held in New Orleans, Louisiana on April 23-26, 2012. OPDP has determined that the materials misbrand Amyvid in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. 352(a) & (n). See 21 CFR 202.1(e)(6)(xviii).
Background
Below are the indication and summary of the most serious and common risks associated with the use of Amyvid.1 According to the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section of the FDA-approved product labeling (PI):
Amyvid is indicated for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the brain to estimate β-amyloid neuritic plaque density in adult patients with cognitive impairment who are being evaluated for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and other causes of cognitive decline. A negative Amyvid scan indicates sparse to no neuritic plaques and is inconsistent with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD at the time of image acquisition; a negative scanresult reduces the likelihood that a patient’s cognitive impairment is due to AD. A positive Amyvid scan indicates moderate to frequent amyloid neuritic plaques; neuropathological examination has shown this amount of amyloid neuritic plaque is present in patients with AD, but may also be present in patients with other types of neurologic conditions as well as older people with normal cognition. Amyvid is an adjunct to other diagnostic evaluations.
1 This information is for background purposes only and does not necessarily represent the risk information that should be included in the promotional piece cited in this letter.
Limitations of Use:
• A positive Amyvid scan does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive
disorder.
• Safety and effectiveness of Amyvid have not been established for:
o Predicting development of dementia or other neurologiccondition;
o Monitoring responses to therapies.
The PI for Amyvid contains Warnings and Precautions regarding the risk of image
misinterpretation and other errors as well as the risk of radiation exposure. In addition,
according to the ADVERSE REACTIONS section of the PI, the most commonly reported
adverse reactions include headache, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and nausea.
Misleading Presentation
The Amyvid webpage features a multi-colored brain image. This presentation misleadingly
suggests that Amyvid PET images can be displayed, and therefore interpreted, in color in
patients with cognitive impairment who are being evaluated for Alzheimer’s Disease and
other causes of cognitive decline, when this is not the case. According to the DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION section of the PI, Amyvid PET scans should be displayed and reviewed
“using a black-white scale with the maximum intensity of the scale set to the maximum
intensity of all the brain pixels.” The PI further includes several examples of black and white
scans to illustrate proper image interpretation.
While many PET images are displayed and reviewed in color, Amyvid scans, as described
above, must be displayed and reviewed using a black and white scale. Additionally, the PI
does not provide instructions for estimating β-amyloid neuritic plaque density using a color
scale with Amyvid. Therefore, use of the color PET scan image of a brain in Amyvid
promotional materials is misleading, particularly considering the warning regarding the risk for
image misinterpretation and other errors.
Conclusion and Requested Action
For the reasons discussed above, this webpage misbrands Amyvid in violation of the FD&C
Act, 21 U.S.C. 352(a) & (n). See 21 CFR 202.1(e)(6)(xviii).
(b) (4)
Please direct your response to the undersigned at the Food and Drug Administration,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Prescription Drug Promotion,
Division of Professional Drug Promotion, 5901-B Ammendale Road, Beltsville,
Reference ID: 3173022
Josephine Secnik Page 3 Eli Lilly and Company NDA 202008/MA #9
Maryland 20705-1266 or by facsimile at (301) 847-8444. Please note that the Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC) has been reorganized and elevated to the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP). OPDP consists of the Immediate Office, the Division of Professional Drug Promotion (DPDP) and the Division of Consumer Drug Promotion (DCDP). To ensure timely delivery of your submissions, please use the full address above and include a prominent directional notation (e.g. a sticker) to indicate that the submission is intended for OPDP. In addition, OPDP recently migrated to a different tracking system. Therefore, OPDP letters will now refer to MA numbers instead of MACMIS numbers. Please refer to MA # 9 in addition to the NDA number in all future correspondence relating to this particular matter. OPDP reminds you that only written communications are considered official.
The violations discussed in this letter do not necessarily constitute an exhaustive list. It is your responsibility to ensure that your promotional materials for Amyvid comply with each applicable requirement of the FD&C Act and FDA implementing regulations.
Sincerely,
{See appended electronic signature page}
James S. Dvorsky, PharmD Regulatory Review Officer Division of Professional Drug Promotion Office of Prescription Drug Promotion
{See appended electronic signature page}
Andrew S.T. Haffer, PharmD Acting Director Division of Professional Drug Promotion Office of Prescription Drug Promotion
Reference ID: 3173022
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
/s/
JAMES S DVORSKY 08/10/2012
ANDREW S HAFFER 08/10/2012
Reference ID: 3173022
Promotional Material
Posted: September 2012

Basic Veterinary Compounding Course Offered By

The overall goal of this practice based course is to introduce the pharmacist and pharmacy technician to veterinary pharmacy compounding. This program provides the fundamental techniques for compounding medications for animals, as well as establishing and marketing a veterinary pharmacy practice.

Upon completion of this program, the participant will be able to:
  • Demonstrate knowledge of regulatory requirements and professional standards that affect veterinary compounding
  • Demonstrate the ability to perform calculations necessary to compound veterinary preparations
  • Demonstrate the ability to compound a variety of veterinary preparations
  • Demonstrate knowledge of animal diseases where a compounding pharmacist and/or technician can impact animal medication compliance.

When

Thursday September 27, 2012 at 8:00 AM CDT
-to-
Friday September 28, 2012 at 5:00 PM CDT

Where

ACA National Training Laboratory
2830 Summer Oaks Drive
Bartlett, TN 38134

For more information click here.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Thomson Reuters News & Insight

Thomson Reuters News & Insight

Lawsuit to Ban "Fake" Makena Dismissed

Lawsuit to Ban "Fake" Makena Dismissed

Lawsuit KV Loses - Cafepharma Message Boards

Lawsuit KV Loses - Cafepharma Message Boards

DC Court has Issued Opinion in K-V v. FDA case

To view the decision click here

Strategic Agreement Launches Novel Drug Development Model


Professional Compounding Centers of America (PCCA) Invests $4 Million In San Diego-based Imprimis Pharmaceuticals; Agrees to Share Topical Drug-Delivery Knowledge and Technology to Bring New Medicines to Market
SOLANA BEACH, Calif., Sept. 7, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IMMY: OTCQB) today announced a strategic development and investment agreement with Houston-based Professional Compounding Centers of America, Inc. (PCCA). The agreement will allow the companies to develop and share drug-formulation technology, with the goal of creating a new generation of treatments for muscle and joint pain, neuropathic pain and other conditions. PCCA also made a $4 million equity investment in Imprimis in a private transaction.
The agreement will give Imprimis exclusive non-PCCA-member access to PCCA's topical technologies and formulation know-how for delivering drugs directly through the skin. The arrangement is intended to identify development opportunities for new topical medications for new therapeutic applications.
Imprimis' lead drug candidate, Impracor™, a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory cream, is expected to enter Phase 3 clinical trials early in 2013. When approved for sale, Impracor would be applied to the site of muscle or joint pain, delivering a clinical dose of medication to the affected area without potential side effects such as stomach irritation or liver problems that have been associated with ingestible, non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs.
The company has also developed Accudel™, a patented topical-delivery platform that can serve as a delivery vehicle for other medications.

To read the remainder of the article, click here.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Dangers aside, drugmakers can't live without Chinese APIs

September 3, 2012 | By Eric Palmer
When it comes Chinese-made APIs, Western drugmakers are between a rock and a hard place. They know Chinese oversight of bulk APIs is insufficient to snuff out substandard producers, but since China produces more APIs than any other country, they can't live without them.
"If China for some reason decided to stop exporting APIs, within three months all our pharmacies would be empty," Guy Villax, CEO of Hovione, tells Reuters. The Portuguese API supplier has factories in China, as well as the U.S. and Ireland.
After 80 U.S. patient deaths were tied to tainted Chinese heparin in 2008, Chinese authorities pledged to crack down on API suppliers. But a Reuters investigation finds that while China is doing more, the fact that many Chinese APIs are substandard or counterfeit is an open secret. "Illegal ingredients in bulk are a big problem, but nobody talks about it," Villax says.


Read more: Dangers aside, drugmakers can't live without Chinese APIs - FiercePharma Manufacturing http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/story/dangers-aside-drugmakers-cant-live-without-chinese-apis/2012-09-03#ixzz25iHugod3 
Subscribe: http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FiercePharma Manufacturing-FiercePharma Manufacturing

UPDATED: FDA finds DPT's Center of Excellence not so sterile

Warning letter notes sterility test failures in 6 lots in 2 years

The FDA has raised serious concerns about the sterility procedures at DPT Laboratories' Center of Excellence for Sterile and Specialty Products in Lakewood, NJ, particularly over an ointment intended to help heal skin wounds and burns.

The contract manufacturer, in a statement, says it is working with the FDA to fix its problems. DPT, which in July was acquired by a private equity firm, invested $40 million in an expansion of the plant in 2010 so that it could specialize in aseptic production of sterile dosage meds. But FDA inspectors, during visits in February and March, found problems with microbial contamination and zeroed in on the company's inability to get to the root of the problem, according to a warning letter posted this week on the agency's website. It said that after sterility test failures in 2010 and 2011, the company's response has been to retrain employees in aseptic filling procedures, but that clearly hasn't solved the problem.

The warning letter says that after "the May 2011 sterility failures and then the failed media fill conducted in June 2011, you committed to completing three successful media fills prior to resumption of manufacturing," but the latest lapse indicates that retraining is not the answer.
The letter says DPT has seen 6 lots of Santyl Ointment fail release testing since the plant was approved in November 2010. "These sterility failures indicate that your firm does not have adequate aseptic procedures in place." In June 2011, the letter says, a "Bacillus species was identified in the samples incubated for the media fill," and again inspectors were unimpressed with how the company handled the investigation.


Read rest of article at UPDATED: FDA finds DPT's Center of Excellence not so sterile - FiercePharma Manufacturing http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/story/fda-finds-dpts-center-excellence-not-so-sterile/2012-09-06#ixzz25iH6ncrJ 
Subscribe: http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FiercePharma Manufacturing-FiercePharma Manufacturing

FDA finds 'filth' at compounder repackaging Avastin

September 6, 2012 | By Eric Palmer

    The FDA has ordered a compounding pharmacy in Hollywood, FL, to stop repackaging Avastin after some of the syringes of the cancer drug were found to be contaminated with Streptococcus mitis/oralis and other microorganisms and tied to infections. The agency said that given the conditions of the facility and the practices of the employees, the drugs "may have been contaminated with filth."
In a hard-hitting letter hand-delivered during an outbreak investigation, the FDA said repackaging the Avastin, as well as human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), was well beyond the purview of Infupharma. The FDA warning letter says investigators determined that Infupharma has a contract with another pharmacy to repack Avastin from sterile injectable single-use vials into sterile injectable 1 mL single-use syringes and to repack HCG multiuse vials into single-use syringes for further distribution. But the FDA said the repacking amounted to creating new drugs and that the company was not approved to do that.
Not only that, but the inspectors also found that the employees were untrained and inept and the conditions were unsanitary and that the company did not have separate work areas to "prevent contamination or mix-ups during the course of your aseptic processing."


Read rest of article at: FDA finds 'filth' at compounder repackaging Avastin - FiercePharma Manufacturing http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/story/fda-finds-filth-compounder-repackaging-avastin/2012-09-06#ixzz25iFBBm4m 


Indiana attorney general, prosecutor plan new steps against the sale of synthetic drugs

Indiana attorney general, prosecutor plan new steps against the sale of synthetic drugs

FDA faces curse of double-edged sword over downside of accelerated drug approvals | MedCity News

FDA faces curse of double-edged sword over downside of accelerated drug approvals | MedCity News

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

US FDA pulls 27 ANDAs for drugs made at banned Ranbaxy plants

US FDA pulls 27 ANDAs for drugs made at banned Ranbaxy plants

Substandard APIs will be made as long as Pharmas keep buying them, says WHO

Substandard APIs will be made as long as Pharmas keep buying them, says WHO

Pii named as manufacturer of drug withdrawn by Sun Pharma

Pii named as manufacturer of drug withdrawn by Sun Pharma

Health Care Renewal Blog: Entry on Importance of Knowing API Source


The Health Care Renewal blog has a very interesting post entitled Who Really Makes Brand-Name Pharmaceuticals?  dated Wednesday, September 5, 2012.  While this blog entry is geared toward manufactured drugs, the information regarding the API  and problems with API for foreign sources is equally relevant to compounded drugs.  The blog entry can be read here.


FDA Warning Letter to DPT Lakewood, LLC


On August 27, 2012, the FDA issued a warning letter to DPT Lakewood, LLC, located in New Jersey.  The beginning of the letter states:

During our February 15 to March 7, 2012 inspection of your pharmaceutical manufacturing facility located at 1200 Paco Way, Lakewood , NJ, an investigator from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified significant violations of Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations for Finished Pharmaceuticals, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 210 and 211. These violations cause your drug product, Santyl Ointment, to be adulterated within the meaning of section 501 (a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 351 (a)(2)(8)], in that the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to, or are not operated or administered in conformity with, CGMP.
We have reviewed your firm 's response of March 22, 2012, and note that it lacks sufficient corrective actions.
To read the remainder of this warning letter, click here.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Insurance Company Sues Franck's Over Death of Polo Horses

On July 19, 2012, the Cincinnati Insurance Company filed a complaint in federal district court in the Middle District of Florida seeking declaratory judgment against Franck's Pharmacy, Inc., Franck's Lab, Inc., Quorum Management Corporation, the management company for the horses, Diamond Insurance Company, and the individuals who owned the horses.  Cincinnati Insurance Company alleges that its policy excluded coverage because the damage causing the death of the horses occurred after the nutritional supplement was compounded and shipped.  The federal complaint can be viewed here.  The underlying basis for the federal cause of action is the state cause of action that Diamond filed against Franck's, Quorum, and the individuals who owned the horses.  The state complaint can be viewed here.



FDA Compliance Boot Camp 2012

 

Monday,  Sept.  24 -  Friday,  Sept.  28,  2012 

Seventh Annual FDA Inspections Summit

September 19-21, 2012

Each year, the FDA makes adjustments to its inspection processes and policies. This year is no exception. Recent important changes include:
  • If you think you can easily stop the FDA from taking pictures of your facility during an inspection, think again.  The FDA now advises its inspectors to not ask for permission but take their cameras into facilities and take pictures as they see fit.  If a firm complains, the new policy is for the inspector to contact the firm’s legal counsel and advise the district management immediately.
  • A new user fee may be assessed if FDA conducts a reinspection to evaluate corrective actions that were classified Official Action Indicated (OAI) and determined to be material.  This fee may also be assessed for not complying with a recall order issued by FDA under section 423 or 412(f).
  • FDA investigators are actively data mining your records during inspections.  As nearly all inspectors are using laptops and tablets during their inspections, many are asking for electronic copies of complaint or AER data and taking it back to their hotel rooms each evening to dissect the data and be prepared to ask additional questions the next morning.  Providing old or inaccurate data can quickly lead to problems.
These changes and many more are to be discussed at the Seventh Annual FDA Inspections Summit.  Year after year, the crème de la crème of the industry make it their business to attend this conference and tap into the cumulative knowledge of an accomplished group of top officials from CDER, CDRH, CBER, the Office of Regulatory Affairs (and more).
Register today to hear about breaking news directly from prominent FDA officials. That's why you can't afford NOT to attend the Seventh Annual FDA Inspections Summit on Sept. 19-21 in Bethesda, MD.
Featured Speakers:
  • Steve Silverman, Director, Office of Compliance, CDRH, FDA
  • Lori Lawless, SCSO, Medical Device Specialist, ORA, FDA, Baltimore District
  • Mary Malarkey, Director, Office of Compliance Biologics Quality, CBER, FDA
Summit Faculty:
  • Barbara Immel, President, Immel Resources (Summit Chairperson)
  • Steve Niedelman, Lead Quality Systems and Compliance Consultant, FDA & Life Sciences Practice, King & Spalding, former Deputy Associate Commissioner, Regulatory Operations and Chief Operating Officer, ORA, FDA
  • Ron Johnson, President, Becker & Associates Consulting, Inc., former Director of Compliance, CDRH, FDA
  • Dr. Gilda D’Incerti, CEO, Pharma Quality Europe
  • Deborah Geyman, Senior Manager Corporate Quality Audit, St. Jude Medical
  • Dr. Stephen Goldman, Managing Member, Stephen A. Goldman Consulting Services, formerly FDA’s first Medical Director of MedWatch
  • Steven Grossman, President, HPS Group, Deputy Executive Director, Alliance for a Stronger FDA, Publisher, FDA Matters: The Grossman FDA Report, former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health, HHS
  • Connie Hoy, Vice President, RA/QA, Cutera
  • Julie Larsen, Director, Inspection Readiness Services, BioTeknica
  • Dr. Jeanne Mattern, Director, QHS Regulatory Compliance Office, Cleveland Clinic
  • Dan O'Leary, President, Ombu Enterprises
  • Matt Quirk, Manager, Clinical QA, St. Jude Medical
  • Kenneth White, Principal Scientist, Clinical Research and Bioscience Group, Social & Scientific Systems
  • Christina Arnt, Post Market Surveillance Manager, St. Jude Medical
  • Braulio Ortiz, Principal/Sr. Quality Consultant, BioTeknica
  • David Elder, Vice President of Strategic Compliance Services, PAREXEL Consulting
  • Elaine Messa, Executive Vice President of the Medical Device Practice, Becker & Associates Consulting, Inc.
  • Michael Bloh, Independent Safety and Pharmacovigilance Consultant
  • Frederick Branding, Principal Attorney, Olson Frank Weeda
  • Scott Cunningham, Partner, Covington & Burling
  • Darshan Kulkarni, Principal Attorney, The Kulkarni Law Firm
  • Cathy Burgess, Partner, Alston & Bird

Click here for more information

Thyroid Medications Recalled | AVMA@Work

Thyroid Medications Recalled | AVMA@Work

Continued NABP Actions Vital to Protecting Public from Rogue Internet Drug Outlet Dangers, Task Force Advises

Continued NABP Actions Vital to Protecting Public from Rogue Internet Drug Outlet Dangers, Task Force Advises

Originally published in the August 2012 NABP Newsletter

Applying for the .pharmacy generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD), supporting relevant legislation, and educating consumers, health care providers, and law enforcement, are among the many actions NABP should continue to undertake in order to protect the public health from Internet drug outlets, as agreed by the 2011-2012 NABP Task Force on Internet Pharmacy Practice. Task force members discussed the complex network of operations behind rogue Internet drug outlets to determine how such entities can be shut down, and made several recommendations in this regard. Further, members discussed the importance of continuing to share NABP’s research findings on rogue Internet drug outlets with both United States and international regulators, law enforcement, and other stakeholders. Members also agreed that the Association should take additional actions to support boards of pharmacy efforts to help shut down rogue Web sites illegally selling drug products.
The Task Force on Internet Pharmacy Practice met March 6-7, 2012, at NABP Headquarters and accepted their charge as follows:
  1. Review existing Internet pharmacy practices;
  2. Review current state laws and regulations, Verified Internet Pharmacy Practice SitesCM (VIPPS®) program standards, and NABP Model State Pharmacy Act and Model Rules of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy language; and
  3. Examine future opportunities and challenges in an emerging global environment.
The full article includes a summary of the task force recommendations, as well as background information, and is available in the August 2012 NABP Newsletter (PDF) (page 151).

American Society of Health Care Pharmacists Policy Analysis: Track-and-Trace Federal Legislation

Following Pharmaceutical Products Through the Supply Chain
By Lisa A.Daigle, M.A., Policy Analyst
August 2012
Electronic tracking of pharmaceutical products would improve the integrity of the supply chain,enable health care providers to more quickly identify and remove counterfeit and recalled drugs, and improve inventory management.Florida1 and California2 have pharmaceutical pedigree laws,with California’s law inspiring federal legislation that would require an electronic pedigree and track-and-trace system forpharmaceutical products.3
The federal bill proposes establishing a central database where the information from electronic pedigrees would be stored and accessed.
To read remainder of article click here.

Kentucky: Pain Clinic Owners and Doctors Charged in Prescription Drug Conspiracies

August 17, 2012; U.S. Attorney; Eastern District of Kentucky
Local and Out of State Pain Clinic Owners and Doctors Charged in Prescription Drug Conspiracies External link
PIKEVILLE-Between today and late Thursday afternoon, five indictments have been unsealed charging 22 defendants, including five pain clinic owners and six doctors, with offenses related to prescription drugs, money laundering, and health care fraud.

Former Owner of Daytona Beach Clinic Pleads Guilty To Fraud, Conspiracy, and Money Laundering

August 28, 2012; U.S. Attorney; Middle District of Florida
Former Owner of Daytona Beach Clinic Pleads Guilty To Fraud, Conspiracy, and Money Laundering External link
Orlando, FL - United States Attorney Robert E. O'Neill announces that Joseph Wagner (62, Daytona Beach) today pleaded guilty to health care fraud, conspiracy to illegally distribute prescription drugs, and money laundering. Wagner faces a maximum penalty of 30 years in federal prison. He was indicted on June 13, 2012.

Alabama Board of Pharmacy Sterile Compounding Forms

Alabama Board of Pharmacy Requires the Following Forms With Regard to Sterile Compounding Pharmacies:



USP/NF <797> RISK ASSESSMENT - Sterile Compounding Pharmacy
USP<797>Pharmacist Sterile Compounding Statement (Notary requred)  Printable PDF File PDF
USP <797> Risk Level Assessment Form   Printable PDF File  PDF  
USP <797> Compliance Self-Assessment Form   Printable PDF File  PDF    
USP <797> Action Plan, Exception & Compliance Form   Printable PDF File  PDF   

Blue Cross Blue Shield Position in Tennessee on Reimbursement for Compounds

COMPOUND DRUG INFORMATION

Compound drugs, which require a prescription from a doctor, are prepared by a pharmacist who mixes or adjusts drug ingredients to customize a medication to meet a patient’s individual needs. 
Differences Between Compound Drugs and Other Prescription Drugs
Compound drugs often have the same active ingredients as brand-name and generic prescription drugs but can differ from these medications in:
  • strength – compound drugs can be prepared in strengths not usually available;
  • inactive ingredients – compound drugs can be made without some of the dyes, sugars, preservatives and other inactive ingredients found in regular prescription drugs; or
  • form – compound drugs can be prepared as lozenges or syrups instead of hard-to-swallow pills or in other forms that are not usually available..
Coverage for Compound Drugs
Check your Evidence of Coverage (EOC) or member handbook to see if your plan covers compound drugs.
If compound drugs are covered by your plan, it’s important to remember that pharmacies that are in-network for regular prescription drugs may be out-of-network for compound drugs. Based on your pharmacy plan, you may not have to pay 100 percent of the drug’s cost if the pharmacy is in-network for compound drug prescriptions.  Check your EOC or member handbook for more information on your plan's required copayment and/or deductible amounts.
You may have to pay more out of your pocket if you have a prescription for a compound drug filled at a pharmacy that is not in-network for compound drugs.  Check your EOC or member handbook for more information on your plan's coverage for compound drugs purchased at a non-participating pharmacy.
If you have mail order benefits, you can obtain your compound drugs from the mail facility and have your mediations shipped directly to you. 
Choosing a Compound Pharmacy
If you use compound drugs, make sure the pharmacy you use is in-network for filling compound drug prescriptions.  You can do this three different ways:
  • Call the pharmacy you use and ask if they are in-network for compound drugs.
  • Use our “Find a Pharmacy” tool.
  • Call the Member Service number on your ID card.
How to Use the Online “Find a Pharmacy” Tool to Find a Compound Pharmacy:
  • Select your Pharmacy Network.  It is listed on your BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee ID card -- for example, RX01.
  • Select the “Compound Pharmacy” option in the box underneath the Pharmacy Network field to make sure your search is for pharmacies in-network for compound drugs
  • You may also enter your favorite pharmacy’s name, your city, state, zip code or county to narrow your search.
  • Click the “Search” button once you have selected or entered all the appropriate information.
Remember -- Pharmacies that are in-network for regular prescription drugs may be out-of-network for compound drugs.  If you fill a prescription for a compound drug at a pharmacy that is not in-network for compound drugs, you may have to pay more out of your pocket for your medication.
Information is from here.
 

Monday, September 3, 2012

Hospira buys manufacturing, R&D facilities in India - Topix

Hospira buys manufacturing, R&D facilities in India - Topix

Franck's Pharmacy head opens new health care facility

Published: Sunday, September 2, 2012 at 6:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Friday, August 31, 2012 at 5:42 p.m.
Say hello to the new boss of a new health care facility on Southeast 17th Street — and it's the same boss of the recently shuttered Franck's Pharmacy at the same location.
To read more, click here.