Sunday, September 28, 2014

Second Question of the Day September 28, 2014 Isn't it true that compounders and sellers of chemicals are in a direct position to control risk of harm and share in liability--where use is direct result of targeted marketing? Should they then bear the lion's share? Read the 2012 case Barnes v. Bayside Orthopaedics, Inc.


Read complete case here 

No comments: