Shouldn't we first see if this dog will take the pill before we compound a patient-specific compound? Thoughts on where the line is and/or should be drawn?
Human Medications, Human Drugs, Animal Medications, Animal Drugs, Pharmacy law, Pharmaceutical law, Compounding law, Sterile and Non Sterile Compounding 797 Compliance, Veterinary law, Veterinary Compounding Law; Health Care; Awareness of all Types of Compounding Issues; Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), Outsourcing Facilities Food and Drug Administration and Compliance Issues
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Third Question of the Day March 11, 2014 How many times a day is a compounded prescription prepared at the suggestion of the compounding pharmacists? Is this wrong? Allowed? Does it depend on the facts? If for example a vet ask for a medication to treat a specific animal with a specific illness and the pharmacists says one does not exist but I can compound a preparation for you isn't that allowed? What about if a commerically available exist but the pharmacists suggest that some dogs won't swallow the pill and that a compounded preparation can be made in case this dog won't take the commerically available pill. Is that okay?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment