Friday, September 27, 2013

Want to know who is Supporting Congress' Agreement on the Drug Quality and Security Act--Read this


WHAT THEY’RE SAYING: DRUG QUALITY AND SECURITY ACT

September 27, 2013
“This compromise legislation addresses the issues that led to the NECC tragedy, protects the physician-patient-pharmacist relationship, maintains critical patient access to compounded medications, and strengthens the pharmaceutical supply chain.” - NCPA
WASHINGTON, DC – Earlier this week, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Senate HELP Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA) announced bipartisan, bicameral legislation to address high-risk drug compounding practices and strengthen America’s pharmaceutical supply chain. H.R. 3204 – the Drug Quality and Security Act – builds upon the Energy and Commerce Committee’s extensive efforts to improve drug safety and help prevent a future public health crisis like the 2012 meningitis outbreak tied to the New England Compounding Center.
In addition to the bill’s introduction, momentum continues to build around this important effort as dozens of groups have voiced their support. A sampling of the support is provided below:
“This compromise proposal provides a balanced and effective approach to address critical and complex issues surrounding compounded medications, as well as strengthening our nation’s pharmaceutical supply chain. NCPA applauds the House for moving this legislation in expeditious fashion, and urge members to vote in favor of this bipartisan compromise. … NCPA commends the Congress for crafting bipartisan legislation that addresses the New England Compounding Center (NECC) tragedy, ensures quality standards for all compounded pharmaceuticals, and maintains patient access to vital compounded medications.”
“Cancer patients and providers support a pharmaceutical distribution system that will protect against the counterfeit medicines that have put cancer patients at risk in the recent past. Distribution system protections

another recall


The Compounding Shop: FDA News Release - Lack of Sterility Assurance of Drug Products

By Newsroom America Feeds at 11:00 am EasternUPDATED 09/27/2013. Budesonide solution, used for nasal irrigation, from The Compounding Shop may be contaminated and should not be used or administered to patients. Originally posted 05/08/2013http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMe

Highlights of Federal Compounding legislation Draft


Among other highlights, the legislation:
  • Distinguishes compounders engaged in traditional pharmacy practice from those making large volumes of compounded drugs without individual prescriptions. Compounders who wish to practice outside the scope of traditional pharmacy practice can register as outsourcing facilities, but those who choose to remain traditional pharmacies will continue to be primarily regulated by State Boards of Pharmacy as they are in current law.
  • Defines the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) role in oversight of outsourcing facilities.  Outsourcing facilities would be subject to FDA oversight in much the same way as traditional manufacturers.  FDA will know who these outsourcers are and what they are making, receive adverse event reports about compounded drugs, and have the authority and resources to conduct risk-based inspections.  The legislation will give providers and patients the option of purchasing product from outsourcing facilities that comply with FDA quality standards.
  • Offers providers and patients better information about compounded drugs.  The legislation directs FDA to make a list of FDA-regulated outsourcing facilities available on FDA’s website, requires detailed labeling on compounded drugs, and prohibits false and misleading advertising.
  • Clarifies current federal law regarding pharmacy compounding.  The legislation strikes unconstitutional provisions in current law, resolving the patchwork of current federal regulation and applying a uniform standard nationwide.
quoted from here

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Bicameral Pact Uses Market Forces To Push Compounders Toward Voluntary Federal Oversight Lawmakers late Wednesday (Sept. 26) struck a bicameral, bipartisan drug compounding agreement that departs from previous proposals by ditching volume limits and a three-part test in favor of a voluntary regulatory scheme for sterile compounders.

Are we there yet? Bicameral Congressional group posts news about a track-and-trace agreement September 26, 2013



Regulation of compounding pharmacies will be included in the new Drug Quality and Security Act
 
Confirming that, indeed, Congressional committees have been working hard behind the scenes to completea compromise draft legislation that will encompass both the longstanding effort for national rules on trackingpharmaceutical shipments, and the more recent effort to give FDA more authority to regulate compounding pharmacies, several Congressmen issued news releases on Sept. 25 announcing their success. The actual bill remains to be revealed, at least as of early on Sept. 26. 
 
Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), chairman of the Senate Health, Education and Labor Committee, issued astatement that commended “the bipartisan spirit that brought this compromise proposal together” in the form of what will now be called the Drug Quality and Security Act.  “Today we are taking a notable step toward completing the important work of improving the security of our pharmaceutical supply chain and clarifying the regulation of drug compounding,” said a statement from Fred Upton (R-MI), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce committee. “This step will help us protect the health and safety of the American people,” said Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI).
 
Interestingly, the issue of drug compounding seems to have superseded that of track-and-trace legislation in the discussions. The Senate bill put forward earlier this year included regulation of compounding; the House bill did not. Given that track-and-trace legislation has been debated and wrestled with since around 2006, while the compounding topic only appeared within the past year, there was a risk that the ongoing legislative efforts for track and trace could have been derailed by the compounding issue.

Continue to read here
 
 

FDA Law Blog - HHS Issues Refill Reminders Guidance Ahead of Compliance Deadline; FDA’s Fifth Annual Report to Congress on 505(q) Citizen Petitions



Last week, ahead of the September 23, 2013 compliance deadline for its HITECH final rule (also referred to as the “Omnibus Final Rule”), the Department of Health and Human Services issued guidance  entitled “The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Refill Reminders and Other Communications about a Drug or Biologic Currently Being Prescribed for the Individual.”  In prior posts, we discussed the HITECH final ruleherehere, and here.  The guidance, as you guessed it, addresses the refill reminder exception, from the Omnibus Final Rule, and its two prongs:  (1) whether the communication is about a “currently prescribed drug or biologic,” and (2) if the communication involves financial

Here is another viewpoint on compounded hormones and why women turn to them

New Legislative Draft Mixes Congressional Approaches on Compounding, Track and Trace

New Legislative Draft Mixes Congressional Approaches on Compounding, Track and Trace

Drugmakers would get more FDA scrutiny under draft bill By Steve Walsh, Bloomberg News

The U.S. for the first time would have uniform regulations to help identify stolen or fake drugs, and makers would get more scrutiny, under a draft bill from the Senate and House committees that oversee pharmaceutical safety. 

The measure would let the Food and Drug Administration collect and spend fees to cover costs of inspections and licensing. It also would impose handling and record-keeping requirements and create notification rules for drugs that are potentially unsuitable for distribution. 

The measure responds to regulatory gaps revealed by investigations into 50 meningitis-related deaths last year that resulted from tainted medications linked to a compounding pharmacy. It would replace a patchwork of state laws governing distribution of drugs through about 4 billion prescriptions a year filled by compounding and traditional pharmacies, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and House Energy and Commerce committees said in a statement. 

"This legislation will improve the safety of compounded drugs by clarifying the oversight responsibilities of the FDA over large-volume compounders and by holding facilities to high quality standards," Iowa Democrat Tom Harkin, who heads the Senate committee, said in a statement. "This bill also calls for an unprecedented tracing system that will track prescription drugs from manufacturing to distribution." 

Counterfeit Imports 

The FDA said last year that it had discovered counterfeit versions of Roche Holding AG's cancer medicine Avastin -- with no active ingredient -- in boxes identifying the contents as Altuzan, Turkey's version of Avastin, which hasn't been approved for use in the U.S. In 2008 the FDA recalled Baxter International Inc.'s blood thinner heparin; during the crisis, neither the FDA nor Baxter was able to re-create the supply chain, taking weeks to get close to the source, according to a report last year by the Institute of Medicine, part of the Washington-based National Academies of Sciences. 

Under the proposed legislation, manufacturers, repackagers, wholesale distributors and dispensers would, within seven years, be maintaining and sharing records of key information about each drug's distribution history. 

The measure would let drug compounders register as outsourcing facilities subject to the same FDA oversight as traditional pharmacies. That would enable the FDA to identify providers and products, get reports on adverse reactions and make risk-based inspections. 

FDA Criticized 

The FDA came under criticism from Congress for failing to close New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc. before the company shipped fungus-tainted medications to customers across the U.S. in last year's meningitis outbreak. The company subsequently filed for bankruptcy. The FDA told lawmakers that its legal authority over compounding pharmacies needed to be clarified. 

The relevant committee chairmen and the panels' top minority members reached a rare bipartisan accord yesterday after the Republican-controlled House passed a supply-chain bill, H.R. 1919, and the Democratic-majority Senate panel approved compounding pharmacy legislation, S. 959. 

Compounding pharmacies prepare personalized prescriptions and are regulated by state health authorities. Some companies also produce larger amounts of blended medicines. 

A Senate committee staff report released in May found that in the eight months after the meningitis outbreak caused by contaminated compounded drugs, at least 48 compounding companies were found to be producing and selling drugs contaminated or created in unsafe conditions. In at least three cases, visible contamination was spotted in widely distributed sterile compound drugs. 

Documented Deaths 
continue to read   here

Drug compounding compromise reached, Lamar Alexander says House, Senate work out bill, but FDA may not support it Sep. 26, 2013 5:18 AM


A compromise bill that supporters say gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration great regulatory control over drug compounders has been announced by congressional leaders from both the House and Senate, but it is unclear whether it has the support of the FDA itself.
The compromise was disclosed late Wednesday in news releases issued by U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and a bipartisan group of House leaders, including U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat.
The agreement comes a year after the beginning of a fungal meningitis outbreak that took the lives of 16 patients treated in Tennessee and 64 nationwide. The deadly outbreak has been blamed on a Massachusetts drug compounding company that shipped fungus-tainted spinal steroids to health care providers in 20 states.
Industry officials said the compromise had been worked out over the weekend, but they expressed concerns the FDA had last-minute objections.
Erica Jefferson, FDA spokeswoman, said she could not immediately comment on the matter. Actual copies of the legislation were not immediately available.
continue to read here

KUDOS to Texas State Board of Pharmacy (TSBP) for Proposed Rules Relating to Compounding; TSBP Final Report dated August 6, 2013, of Task Force on Preparing Sterile Prepartions

Great Law Review Article by Paul C. Kuhnel entitled Pharmacists and the People Who Sue Them (note article was published in 2007 and some areas such as HIPPA has changed since it was written)

read here

September 26, 2013 Just printed the entire 146 page draft of federal compounding legislation. Note to readers if you are only interested in the compounding part you can just print the first 30 pages!!!

Let the dissecting and digesting of this compounding legislation begin.  I would love to hear what the readers think about this version.

A Quick Read through of the Draft of the ‘‘Drug Quality and Security Act’’ Is leaving Me With More Questions than Answers At this Point? Anyone else feeling the same way about this draft federal legislation?


Copy of the Draft of New Compounding Federal Legislation, ‘‘Drug Quality and Se- 5 curity Act’’, that Believe House and Senate Have Agreement About September 26, 2013

can be reviewed here

Veterinary Feed Directive Proposed Rule Lands At OMB A proposed rule specifying how drugs should be used under veterinary supervision is under review at the White House Office of Management and Budget, according to OMB's website.


At least 19 pharmacies have shut down their compounding operations in the past year, and at least 17 have recalled drugs, according to the FDA.


The FDA has inspected about 70 compounding firms in the past year, said Howard Sklamberg, the director of the FDA Office of Compliance.


MUST READ Interesting Details in this Article!!! September 26, 2013 FDA Inspections Put Compounding Pharmacies In Regulatory Gray Zone

 


Now, a follow-up on a series we aired earlier this year on drug shortages in hospitals. We called it Critical Supply, and we found that compounding pharmacies help hospitals fill the gap with somechemotherapy treatments, emergency crash-cart injections and even basic vitamins that go in IV fluids.
A compounding pharmacy that served many hospitals in the Carolinas remains shut down months after its state board of pharmacy said it could get back to work. That's because the Food and Drug Administration has effectively kept it shut down. But whether the FDA has the authority to do that is unclear. Today, WFAE’s Michael Tomsic reports on the challenges of meeting the FDA’s standards.
From the front, Medi-Fare Drug Center in Blacksburg, SC, looks like your traditional mom-and-pop, small-town pharmacy. Owner Pat Stephens even works the cash register on occasion.
From the front, Medi-Fare Drug Center in Blacksburg, SC, looks like your traditional mom-and-pop, small-town pharmacy. Owner Pat Stephens even works the cash register on occasion.
Credit Michael Tomsic
The front of Medi-Fare.
"Six, seven, eight, nine, ten, and ten is $20," Stephens said as she gave change to a young man who bought an ointment to treat poison ivy about two months ago.
But in the back of Medi-Fare, it’s a different world.
Air roars through the clean room. This is where technicians are supposed to mix and customize prescription drug cocktails that aren’t commercially available.
It was a test day for a newair filtration system in mid August. The air has to flow to a certain way to meet FDA standards. Jesse Gillikin is a consultant working with Medi-Fare.
"We're preparing to do some smoke testing over the newly installed HEPA filters," Gillikin said.
Gillikin broke a glass vial, and white smoke began pouring out. He held it near the vents, which pushed the smoke straight down over the area where technicians will compound. The idea is to have clean air flowing over a drug mix.
"You can see that the smoke is getting below where the top of the tables would be," Gillikin said. "I think the tables are 40 inches. It's a big improvement from the last design."
It’s been a long 9 months for Medi-Fare's owner. FDA inspectors have come several times since December, telling Stephens her clean room isn't up to par. She's trying to comply. And in the meantime, the biggest part of her business is shut down.  
"We've laid off 23 people," Stephens said. And that's out of a staff of close to 30.
It's also meant that about two dozen hospitals in the Carolinas are forced to go elsewhere to get some drugs in short supply. That includes hospitals in Carolinas HealthCare System.
But whether the FDA has the authority to effectively shut down Medi-Fare, or other compounders, is unclear. Sheldon Bradshaw was the FDA's chief counsel from 2005 to 2007.
"The FDA has the authority to regulate drug manufacturing," Bradshaw said. "The FDA does not regulate the practice of pharmacy. That's regulated by the states."
Bradshaw said the line between manufacturers and compounding pharmacies used to be clear. Compounders mixed drugs for specific patients in their communities, while manufacturers created drugs in bulk and often shipped them across the country.
But that line blurred as some compounders grew into big businesses.
"They're going out and creating an entire line of drug products," he said. "They'rehiring a sales force. They're going out and marketing these products to doctors like a drug manufacturer would."
An example is the compounder in New England linked to a deadly meningitis outbreak that started a year ago. There were hundreds of infections across the country, and more than 60 people died.
In response, the FDA has increased inspections of compounders, arguing they're more like manufacturers. But Bradshaw said that can be a tough argument.
"Where you have a gray area is in these cases where you have a smaller mom and pop pharmacy like the one in South Carolina that’s engaged in some compounding, perhaps even in bulk, in response to a request from a hospital for products that aren't commercially available," he said.
Hospitals have made more of those requests to Medi-Fare and other compounders as drug shortages have intensified in the past few years.
The FDA has inspected about 70 compounding firms in the past year, said Howard Sklamberg, the director of the FDA Office of Compliance. Sklamberg acknowledged the FDA's authority over compounders is unclear. But he said, "We don't send into a firm lawyers with law books."
"We send scientists and trained professionals who know how sterile drugs are supposed to be made," Sklamberg continued. He said inspectors have found startling conditions, like pharmacists using a coffee filter to filter drugs.
"We inspect and we look at the conditions in a firm, then we come back to FDA, and if there's an emergency, we take care of it," he said. "But when we think of using the law, we then consult our lawyers."

Prevent Tennessee Families From “Living Through Another Nightmare Like Last Year’s Tragic Meningitis "The FDA commissioner has warned us that, without fixing oversight, a similar outbreak will happen again, so I have worked hard with my colleagues in the House and Senate to make it clear at every..

read here

NOTE: Until the draft of the federal compounding legislation is released and reviewed it is very hard to predict any impact or issues it might have. For example, NYT indicate Under the new system, federal regulators would be able to track what the compounding pharmacies are making, receive reports about problems with any of the compounded drugs, and have the authority to conduct safety inspections.


Question of the Day September 26, 2013 Once you register (assuming it is now going to be optional) under the new federal compounding legislation (remembering there is an agreement; but it has not passed yet), can you "unregister" as an outsourcing facility later?Are there any penalties for doing that?


Bill would toughen compounding pharmacy oversight - Business Breaking News - MiamiHerald.com

Bill would toughen compounding pharmacy oversight - Business Breaking News - MiamiHerald.com

Reports Are that There will no Requirement that compounding pharmacies register under the new federal legislation. Not sure how that is going to work. I do know without funding to hire people the FDA will ultimately have no ability to enforce federal compounding legislation and thus ultimately nothing in all probability will change.


More Sway for F.D.A. Is Object of New Bill By SABRINA TAVERNISE Published: September 25, 2013


A bipartisan committee of lawmakers from the Senate and the House reached a compromise on Wednesday on legislation that would give the Food and Drug Administration greater control over compounding pharmacies. But analysts said it was still unclear whether the law would actually make drugs safer.
Lawmakers said the bill’s primary function was to help prevent another national health disaster like the meningitis outbreak last year that was traced to a large Massachusetts-based compounding pharmacy, a company that mixes specialty medicine. More than 60 people died and more than 700 were sickened after receiving injections of a contaminated steroid made by the pharmacy, the New England Compounding Company.
The F.D.A. has argued repeatedly that it has limited authority over compounders, which are now regulated by state boards of pharmacy, even though many ship drugs across state lines.
The bill’s authors argued that it would give the agency broader powers by placing some compounding pharmacies in a separate category that would require them to behave much like traditional drug manufacturers: to alert the authorities when something goes wrong with their products, to register with the F.D.A. and to allow agency officials into their facilities for inspection, much as traditional drug manufacturers do.
But the language of a statement issued late on Wednesday by the bill’s authors implied that companies would not be required to be part of the new category, leaving the option open to those compounding facilities “who wish” to join.
If being part of the new group is optional, that means there will be a reliance on the market to drive demand for products made under the stricter standards, said Allan Coukell, a drug policy expert at the Pew Charitable Trusts.
“It will be incumbent on the purchaser — the physician, clinic or hospital — to opt for drugs from F.D.A.-regulated facilities,” he said.
Under current law, compounders are not required to give the F.D.A. access to their books, or to allow them in to their production facilities for . About half of all the court orders the agency obtained over the past decade were for pharmacy compounders, although compounders were only a small part of the agency’s regulatory responsibilities.
A Senate staff member with knowledge of the legislation said the goal of the bill was to create an incentive for compounding pharmacies to register with the F.D.A., even though it is not a requirement for companies to do so.
continue to read here

Guidance, Compliance & Enforcement Federal Register Notices

Guidance, Compliance & Enforcement Federal Register Notices

Quoted from NABP--Michigan Lawmakers Consider Bill to Strengthen Compounding Regulations



A series of bills have been introduced to the Michigan Legislature that would include several provisions intended to strengthen the regulation of compounding in the state. The bills would require: 
  • an on-site “pharmacist-in-charge” at every compounding facility,
  • detailed records for all sterile compounded products,
  • criminal background checks for new pharmacy owners, or those licensed before October 1, 2008, and
  • at least one biannual inspection for each facility.
As of September 6, 2013, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traced 264 cases and 19 deaths in the state of Michigan to the 2012 outbreak of fungal meningitis linked to contaminatedpain medications compounded at the New England Compounding Center in Massachusetts. These numbers led Michigan’s Attorney General, Bill Schuette, one of the bill’s backers, to call Michigan the “epicenter” of the outbreak. More information is available in a Detroit News article and in a Detroit Free Press article.

Senate, House Health Policy Leaders Announce Bipartisan, Bicameral Legislation to Address High-Risk Drug Compounding Practices and Secure the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Wednesday, September 25, 2013


WASHINGTON, D.C. —Leaders from the Senate and House committees overseeing health policy today announced that they have reached an agreement on legislation to help ensure the safety of compounded drugs and our nation’s pharmaceutical supply chain. This legislation, the Drug Quality and Security Act, reflects a bipartisan, bicameral effort to improve drug safety and help prevent a future public health crisis like the 2012 meningitis outbreak tied to the New England Compounding Center.
“Plain and simple, this legislation will help ensure that providers and their patients have access to high-quality compounded drugs,” said Senate HELP Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA).  “This legislation will improve the safety of compounded drugs by clarifying the oversight responsibilities of the FDA over large-volume compounders and by holding facilities to high quality standards.  This bill also calls for an unprecedented tracing system that will track prescription drugs from manufacturing to distribution. I commend the bipartisan spirit that brought this compromise proposal together.”
“This bill will help prevent Tennessee families from living through another nightmare like last year’s tragic meningitis outbreak, which has killed 16 Tennesseans and sickened so many others. The FDA commissioner has warned us that an outbreak like this will happen again if we don’t clarify oversight, so I have worked hard with my colleagues in the House and Senate to make it clear at every compounding facility who’s on the flagpole—who’s in charge—of overseeing their compounding practices,” said Senate HELP Committee Ranking Member Lamar Alexander (R-TN).
“Today we are taking a notable step toward completing the important work of improving the security of our pharmaceutical supply chain and clarifying the regulation of drug compounding.  This step will help us protect the health and safety of the American people,” said Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI). “The leadership of Rep. Morgan Griffith, Rep. Bob Latta, Health Subcommittee Chairman Joe Pitts, and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Tim Murphy has been fundamental in achieving this bipartisan agreement. It has been nearly one year since the tragic, deadly fungal meningitis outbreak and I am pleased to be working with my colleagues in the Senate to send a bill to the president’s desk, bringing this investigative and legislative effort to a successful conclusion soon. In light of the missed opportunities to prevent the outbreak, with this bill we say, ‘never again.’”
“This legislation is a major stride toward the goal of ensuring the quality and safety of the medicines Americans rely upon every day," said Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Henry A. Waxman (D-CA).  "The bill will correct the constitutional defect in FDA’s drug compounding statute that has wreaked havoc on the Agency’s ability to effectively enforce the law for years.  It will also give FDA the opportunity to have broad oversight of a new category of large compounding pharmacies.  This is undoubtedly a step forward for public health.  Further, we have developed a uniform system for tracking and tracing drugs to prevent counterfeits from entering the supply chain that maintains the strengths of the groundbreaking California system. I want to acknowledge the contributions of Reps. Frank Pallone, John Dingell, Diana DeGette, Gene Green, Jim Matheson, and former Rep., now Senator, Ed Markey to this bipartisan effort."
The bill clarifies current federal law regarding pharmacy compounding and resolves the patchwork of current federal regulation by applying a uniform standard nationwide.
Further, compounders who wish can register as outsourcing facilities, but those who choose to remain traditional pharmacies will continue to be regulated primarily by state boards of pharmacy, as they are in current law.  Outsourcing facilities would be subject to oversight by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in much the same way as traditional manufacturers are monitored.  FDA will know who these outsourcers are and what they are making, receive adverse event reports about compounded drugs, and have the authority and resources to conduct risk-based inspections. 
The second title of the bill would replace today’s patchwork of state prescription-drug tracing laws by creating a new uniform framework for tracking drugs from the manufacturer to the pharmacy. There is currently no system for tracking the drugs that make up some four billion prescriptions per year in the United States, which means drugs that are stolen or counterfeit may not be discovered before reaching consumers.
recently-released report from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) confirmed that legislation is needed to clarify the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) oversight of large-scale drug compounders. The nonpartisan office wrote that “this lack of consensus and differing FDA authority to oversee compounded drugs across the country has resulted in gaps in oversight of drug compounding,” posing a grave threat to public health.