Monday, October 22, 2018

Promise Pharmacy Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Prednisolone and Gatifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution 1%/0.5% Sterile Due to Small Particulate Floating in the Solution OCTOBER 22, 2018

Promise Pharmacy is voluntarily recalling one lot of Prednisolone and Gatifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution 1%/0.5% sterile, 3ml vials,to the patient consumer level. The product has been found to have unidentified small particulate floating in the solution.
To date Promise Pharmacy has not received any reports of adverse events related to this recall. Potential adverse health consequences could range from limited eye irritation, inflammation and visual impairment to permanent ocular damage with the use of this eye drop solution.
The product is used as a post-surgical (cataract) ophthalmic treatment and was distributed Nationwide to individual patients.
Lot Number 09042018@2, Exp. 12/03/2018 is the only affected lot.
Promise Pharmacy is notifying its prescribers and patients by telephone and mail and is arranging for return/replacement/refund of all recalled product
Patients who have product that is being recalled should stop using it and return it to Promise Pharmacy. Patients will be sent packaging with a prepaid shipping label to facilitate prompt return of product to the pharmacy.
Prescribers and patients with questions regarding this recall can contact Promise Pharmacy at (727) 772-0500 x233 Monday through Friday between the hours of 9:00 am and 3:30 pm EST, or via email to mark@promisepharmacy.com. Patients should contact their prescribing physician if they have experienced any problems that may be related to using this product.
Adverse reactions or quality problems associated with the use of this product may be reported to FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program either by phone, on line, by regular mail or by fax.

Pharmacist launches petition opposing responsible pharmacist ...

The Pharmaceutical Journal-12 hours ago
pharmacist has started a petition calling on the government to reject responsible pharmacist proposals, which has already received more than 1,800 ..

Question of the Day 10/22/2018 Is anyone in Congress still following the fall out from the NECC outbreak?

Meningitis outbreak: Ex-pharmacy tech says falsifying expiration dates ...

The Tennessean-6 hours ago
That was the testimony Monday of a former pharmacy technician at the defunct New England Compounding Center. He told jurors it was a routine practice to put ...

Allergan Fights For Ropes & Gray Docs In Compounder IP Suit

Allergan Fights For Ropes & Gray Docs In Compounder IP Suit

Law360-5 hours ago
The compounding pharmacies Prescriber's Choice Inc. and Sincerus Florida LLC had initially argued that a memo authored by Ropes & Gray attorneys, which .

Observation of the Day 10/22/2018 This case is probably a little bigger than most readers will realize. It is very important because it relates to bulk powder compounding and because it shows how compounding pharmacists, employees and owners can potential avoid criminal charges or jail time if they "voluntarily disclose[] the misconduct to federal authorities and t[ake] steps to fix the problem."

Kentucky medical company filed false insurance claims. Now it must ...

Lexington Herald Leader-6 hours ago
Compounding pharmacies make customized medicine for patients, typically by mixing ingredients to produce a prescription cream, according to the news ...

FDA Law Blog: California Cuts Manufacturers Some Slack; Amends Slack Fill Law October 23, 2018 By RiĆ«tte van Laack —


http://www.fdalawblog.net/

Meningitis outbreak: Ex-tech says pharmacy routinely falsified drug ...

6 hours ago - A former New England Compounding Center pharmacy tech says it was routine to put false expiration dates on drugs shipped to health care facilities.

Witness: Compounding Center Used Fake Names on Drug Prescriptions

10 hours ago - A former salesman for the New England Compounding Center took the stand last week and claimed that the drug firm used falsified names on prescription drugs .
23 hours ago - Compounding pharmacies make customized medicine for patients, typically by mixing ingredients to produce a prescription cream, according to the news .

October 22, 2018: Medical Equipment Company Agrees to Pay $5.25 Million to Resolve Allegations of Fraudulent Claims for Compounded Medical Creams

 U.S. Department of Justice Press Release

 
For Immediate Release
October 22, 2018
United States Department of Justice
Eastern District of Kentucky
LEXINGTON, Ky. – Cooley Medical Equipment, Inc., an Eastern Kentucky medical equipment supplier headquartered in Prestonsburg, Kentucky, has agreed to pay $5,254,912 to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by submitting false or fraudulent claims that misrepresented the ingredients used in certain compounded medical creams. 

Cooley previously operated a pharmacy in Prestonsburg that in 2015 began making compounded medical creams.  Compounding pharmacies, like Cooley’s, prepare customized medications for individual patients, usually by mixing ingredients in order to create a prescription cream.  Cooley billed these prescriptions to government insurers, including Medicare, Kentucky Medicaid, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (known as CHAMPVA).  Cooley was required by CHAMPVA and Kentucky Medicaid to obtain their prior authorization in order to use bulk powder forms of Lidocaine and Prilocaine as ingredients in its compounded creams. Without such prior authorization, Kentucky Medicaid and CHAMPVA would not reimburse Cooley for the creams.  Medicare, through its Part D program, does not cover bulk powder ingredients at all. 

Rather than go through the prior authorization process, or face limited reimbursement from Medicare Part D, Cooley misrepresented the nature of its Lidocaine and Prilocaine ingredients in its claims to federal insurers, falsely stating that Cooley’s compounded medical creams were made with cream-based Lidocaine and Prilocaine ingredients, instead of the bulk powder Cooley actually used.  This practice led to the submission of thousands of false claims by Cooley between January 2015 and December 2016, and millions of dollars in improper reimbursements.  Cooley did voluntarily self-disclose this misconduct to the United States Attorney’s Office, took proactive steps to resolve the problem, and no longer operates a compounding pharmacy.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Cooley will be allowed to pay back the $5,254,912, plus interest, over a period of 6 years.  Because Cooley self-disclosed the misconduct, it was able to resolve its liability for only 1.5 times the amount of monetary loss caused by its false claims; by statute, the False Claims Act typically imposes liability for 3 times the amount of loss suffered by the government.  In addition, because of Cooley’s self-disclosure, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the Medicare and Medicaid programs, has agreed not to pursue any administrative action against Cooley that would exclude it from further participation in those federal programs.

“The Department of Justice, and our Office, take seriously the responsibility to aggressively pursue False Claims Act cases, as payment of false or fraudulent claims reduces the pool of money available to pay legitimate claims,” stated United States Attorney Robert M. Duncan, Jr.  “Recovering false or fraudulent payments is an essential component of our Affirmative Civil Enforcement efforts and defends the financial integrity of these government programs.  We will continue to prioritize these important cases.”     

This settlement was a result of an investigation by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Kentucky and the United States Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigation (FDA-OCI).  An investigation of individuals within Cooley who were responsible for this misconduct is ongoing.  Assistant United States Attorney Paul McCaffrey handled the matter for the United States.  Cooley admits the allegations contained in the Settlement Agreement, but there been no judicial determination of liability.

Topic(s): 
Health Care Fraud

Component(s): 
False Claims Act