Hospira issues 3 recalls as it faces crucial FDA inspection

February 27, 2013 | By Eric Palmer

Sterile injectables maker Hospira ($HSP) is having to recall lots of 5 different products even as FDA inspectors are in one of its plants conducting what the company hopes will be a final inspection that will return the drugmaker to the agency's good graces.
Over the last several days, Hospira recalled three lots of propofol injectable emulsion after reports came to light that some vials had visible particles embedded in the glass. These were found in some retained samples. It is recalling one lot of preservative-free morphine sulfate injection after a customer found either a loose crimp or no crimp on the flip-top vial, which raises the possibility of contamination. It also recalled three lots of diazepam injection, furosemide injection and Quelicin (succinylcholine chloride) injection for the same problem with loose crimping in flip tops.
The company said all of the recalls are voluntary and there have been no reports of patients being affected by any of the recalled products, although in each case there is a chance for serious effects.


Read more: Hospira issues 3 recalls as it faces crucial FDA inspection - FiercePharma http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/hospira-issues-3-recalls-it-faces-crucial-fda-inspection/2013-02-27#ixzz2MAnwvSbt
Subscribe: http://www.fiercepharma.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FiercePharma-FiercePharma

FDA HAS RAMPED UP INSPECTIONS OF APIs--From FiercePharma Manufacturing: FDA warning to Abbey questions quality of API for sterile drugs Warning Letter lists repeat violation on water quality February 27, 2013 | By Eric Palmer Read more: FDA warning to Abbey questions quality of API for sterile drugs

The FDA says an active pharmaceutical ingredient maker in Philadelphia had yet to qualify that its purified water was in fact pure enough to make APIs two years after the agency noted a deficiency.
Abbey Color was told in a new warning letter posted to the FDA website this week that the agency is dissatisfied with the steps the company has taken to demonstrate that its water is suitable for use in manufacturing fluorescein USP, an API used in sterile drug products.
The inspection was conducted nearly a year ago, but the agency notes the company had promised in 2010 that it would make sure it had a reliable source of quality water. The most recent inspection found Abbey still passes spec endotoxin and total organic carbon test results. But inspectors found the operational parameters and effectiveness of an endotoxin removal unit had not been qualified and that Abbey was not monitoring the microbial and chemical attributes of the feed water.

The Biotech Primer: An insider's guide to the science driving the biotech and pharma industries

The Biotech Primer is a 200-page book featuring illustrations and a glossary of biotechnology terms. The text takes an in-depth look at the biotech industry, and in particular, the science that drives it. Although the industry itself is constantly changing, these fundamental concepts upon which it is built will remain important for years to come - and decision-makers who understand these fundamentals will be better able to evaluate and predict new trends.Click here to buy today!

Sign up for our FREE newsletter for more news like this sent to your inbox!The FDA also came down on the company for not getting to the root cause of its water-supply issues. The manufacturer was further criticized for not setting up an adequate program to monitor API stability that would determine how the API should be stored.
The FDA has been ramping up inspections of APIs, and drugmakers using additional user fees that kicked in this year from generic manufacturers. But that work is being put to risk by looming across-the-board budget cuts from the current sequestration fight in Congress. A recent Congressional Budget Office (OMB) ruling said that user fees have to be cut as well. Regulatory Focus recently figured the cuts would mean a loss of about $200 million from the FDA's base budget and an estimated $112 million (annualized) in lost user fees.

- here's the warning letter

Read more: FDA warning to Abbey questions quality of API for sterile drugs - FiercePharma Manufacturing http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/story/fda-warning-abbey-questions-quality-api-sterile-drugs/2013-02-27#ixzz2MAm4Tpmh
Subscribe: http://www.fiercepharmamanufacturing.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FiercePharma Manufacturing-FiercePharma Manufacturing

FDA's Drug Center Creating New Office Of Pharmaceutical Quality, Hamburg Says Wednesday, February 27, 2013 from Pharmaceutical Law & Industry Report ®

By Bronwyn Mixter 
The Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research is working on creating a new office of pharmaceutical quality, FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg said Feb. 22.
Speaking at the Generic Pharmaceutical Association's (GPhA) annual conference, Hamburg said the new office would not impose any new quality requirements but rather enforce existing quality standards.
“We must be strategic and have systems in place for continual quality surveillance,” Hamburg said. “Quality is one of our highest priorities” in 2013, she added.
In 2012, CDER Director Janet Woodcock said CDER was exploring the idea of creating a new Office of Pharmaceutical Quality (OPQ) to oversee quality throughout the lifecycle of a drug (10 PLIR 1196, 9/14/12).

Generic User Fees

Hamburg also said the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012 (GDUFA) is moving forward, and “it is going to make an enormous difference.”
The generic drug user fees give FDA the funding it needs to reduce the backlog of generic drug applications, Hamburg said.
Hamburg said FDA has collected $125 million in GDUFA fees for 2013 so far. However, she noted, the budget situation and sequestration have “significant implications” for using generic user fees and budget dollars. Budget cuts under the Budget Control Act of 2011--known as sequestration--are scheduled to be implemented at the beginning of March, while legislation funding the federal government expires at the end of March. In September 2012, a report from the White House Office of Management and Budget classified all budgetary resources available to FDA, including user fees, as subject to sequestration (10 PLIR 1332, 10/12/12).

Biosimilars

FDA is moving forward with creating a biosimilars pathway, Hamburg said. A pathway to approve biosimilars was created in a 2010 law, but FDA is still implementing it.
In 2012, FDA issued three draft guidances for industry on biosimilars, and the agency “is moving forward to finalize” these guidances, Hamburg said (10 PLIR 173, 2/10/12).
“So far FDA has yet to receive an application for a biosimilar product,” Hamburg said. “We are ready” and “eager to engage in that next stage of the process.”
Hamburg said FDA has met with several manufacturers about developing biosimilar products.
Additionally, Hamburg said FDA is seeking public comments on its strategic plan to prevent drug shortages. FDA published a notice requesting comments in the Feb. 12 Federal Register (78 Fed. Reg. 9,928) (11 PLIR 206, 2/15/13). The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) requires the development and implementation of a strategic plan for enhancing FDA's response to preventing and mitigating drug shortages, according to the notice.

---

The Federal Register notice requesting comments on FDA's drug shortage plan is at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-12/pdf/2013-03198.pdf.

Source found here

Ed Silverman's Pharmalot blog-What’s Not To Like? Facebook And The FDA

• Pharma Blog » 2013 » February » 27

Last month, the FDA tagged a dietary supplement maker for a laundry list of infractions, but one item tucked away in a December 11 warning letter stands out. The agency complained to Amarc Enterprises that one of its products was ‘liked’ last year on its Facebook page. This was cited as one example of numerous testimonials that could be construed as claims that cause the Poly MVA supplement to be considered a drug. - See more at: http://www.pharmalot.com/2013/02/whats-not-to-like-facebook-and-the-fda/#sthash.ewA1JpWz.dpuf