Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Hospital Pharmacies Step Up Compounding Efforts In Wake Of Meningitis Outbreak


BOSTON — Physicians and hospitals are scrambling for the specialty compounds produced by the New England Compounding Center in Framingham and a related company, Ameridose. Both companies closed following the national meningitis outbreak caused by contaminated steroids made by NECC that killed 36 people and sickened 510.
Some hospitals in Massachusetts are responding in ways that could be better for patients.
MGH Pharmacy Goes 24/7
Patients at Massachusetts General Hospital take some 400,000 doses of medication every month — 4.8 million a year. And until two months ago, close to a million of them were compounded by third-party vendors, such as NECC and, even more, Ameridose. Now, most of that work has been brought in house to MGH’s central pharmacy.
It’s a clinical beehive where technicians in varying surgical outfits fill IV bags and sort syringes. Behind air-locked doors, more workers sit under high-tech bays — or “hoods” — compounding sterile medications.
Just outside this “clean room,” lead technician Meghan Federico sorts test tubes.
“It’s what we put our samples in, specimen samples, to test for sterility,” Federico said.
No doubt this was a busy place before Ameridose was closed. But now, this lab is really humming.
continue reading here

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Malpractice bills spawn rift over meningitis settlement

Nov. 27, 2012  

An attorney for meningitis victims worries that lame-duck Michigan legislators will enact a series of medical malpractice bills that would make it harder for clients to recover damages.
Supporters of the legislation say the bills won't impact meningitis cases.
The bills would expand immunity for medical professionals and place limits on damages plaintiffs could receive.
"Any changes to malpractice standards will make it more difficult for steroid patients to bring a case," said Marc Lipton, who is representing Howell meningitis victim Brenda Bansale.
The bills have awaited action by the Senate Insurance Committee for several months.
State Sen. Joe Hune, the committee chairman, said the bills "wouldn't involve the meningitis cases."
"We've been meeting with trial lawyers and members of the medical profession," said Hune, R-Hamburg Township. "Hopefully, we'll be coming to some kind of consensus."
At least two of four bills could be released as soon as today with floor debate and a potential vote coming as soon as Thursday, Hune said.
A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, R-Monroe, said it was hoped they would all come to the floor before the Senate adjourns for the year.
"There is a desire to see it happen," Richardville spokeswoman Amber McCann said. "There's a laundry list of items awaiting action, and medical malpractice is on that list."
Of the four bills, S.B. 1116 would exempt medical professionals from liability if they acted with "reasonable good faith" based on medical practices and patients' best interest.
While this is considered the centerpiece of malpractice reform, Hune said the bill "probably wouldn't be released" from committee today.
Another bill, S.B. 1115, would place limits on damages issued for the loss of household services. That bill caused a particular concern for Lipton.
"My client has been disabled for three months. That means she doesn't do things that she normally does like cooking, cleaning and balancing the checkbook. There's an economic value to that," Lipton said.
Among the other bills, S.B. 1117, tightens requirements for expert witnesses in malpractice cases while S.B. 1118 limits the time frame for interest on damages.
A fifth bill, dealing with emergency room cases, has yet to be debated by the committee.
Bansale is among those seeking damages from New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc. Health officials believe the contaminated steroids were mixed at the now-closed Massachusetts facility. Congress is debating whether to expand the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's ability to regulate similar facilities.
Michigan law restricts victims of defective FDA-approved drugs from suing drug manufacturers, though legal professionals believe the compounding facility can be sued because its products are exempt from FDA review.
Hune earlier joined Gov. Rick Snyder and Attorney General Bill Schuette in calling for the Bureau of Health Professionals to suspend the compounding pharmacy's license, which would prevent it from marketing any more products in Michigan.
The Michigan Department of Community Health has linked four deaths in Livingston County to the meningitis outbreak. In all, the department says 178 cases, including 10 deaths, have been connected to the outbreak in Michigan.
Contact Daily Press & Argus reporter Wayne Peal at (517) 548-7081 or at wpeal@gannett.com.
Source found here

Case Count as of November 26, 2012: 510* States: 19* Deaths: 36*


Texas Attorney General

Texas Attorney General

FDA PUBLIC MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2012, Framework for Pharmacy Compounding: State and Federal Roles


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-1154]
Framework for Pharmacy Compounding: State and Federal Roles
AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION:  Notice of public meeting; request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following public
meeting entitled “Framework for Pharmacy Compounding: State and Federal Roles.”  At this
public meeting, FDA and State representatives will share their perspectives.
Date and Time:  The public meeting will be held on December 19, 2012, from 3 p.m. to
5 p.m.  Onsite registration will be on a first-come, first-served basis beginning at 2 p.m.
Location:  The public meeting will be held at the FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Building 31 Conference Center, the Great Room (rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD
20993.  
Entrance for the public meeting participants (non-FDA employees) is through Building 1
where routine security check procedures will be performed. For parking and security
information, please refer to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOakCampusInform
ation/ucm241740.htm.
If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Steve Morin, FDA
Office of Special Health Issues, 301-796-0161, email: Steve.Morin@fda.hhs.gov no later than
December 14, 2012. 2
Contact Person: Patricia Kuntze, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New H Ave.,
Bldg. 32, rm. 5322, Silver Spring, MD  20993; patricia.kuntze@fda.hhs.gov.
Streaming Webcast of the Meeting: This public meeting will also be Webcast.  Persons
interested in viewing the Webcast should use the access connection at
https://collaboration.fda.gov/pharmacycompounding/.  The Webcast will begin on December 19,
2012, at 3 p.m. ET.
If you have never attended a Connect Pro meeting before, test your connection at:
https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. Get a quick overview
at: http://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview.  Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat and
Acrobat Connect are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated
in the United States and/or other countries.
If for some reason the test page does not work, that is not a definite indicating factor that
the actual Webcast will not work.  The test link sometimes appears to be broken on some
individuals’ computers. (FDA has verified the Web site addresses in this document, but FDA is
not responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web sites after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
This Webcast will be closed captioned.
Comments:  In order to obtain public comment, FDA is also soliciting either electronic or
written comments on the issues discussed in section II of this document.  The deadline for
submitting comments is January 18, 2013.
Regardless of attendance at the meeting, interested persons may submit either written
comments regarding this document to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852 or electronic 3
comments to http://www.regulations.gov. It is only necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.  In
addition, when submitting comments on issues as outlined in section II of this document, please
identify the issue you are addressing.  Received comments may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to
the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.
Transcripts:  Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is available, it will be
accessible at http://www.regulations.gov.  It may be viewed at the Division of Dockets
Management (see Comments).  A transcript will also be available in either hardcopy or on CDROM, after submission of a Freedom of Information request.  Written requests are to be sent to
the Division of Freedom of Information (ELEM-1029), Food and Drug Administration, 12420
Parklawn Dr., Element Bldg., Rockville, MD  20857.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I.  Background
The recent outbreak of fungal meningitis associated with drugs produced and sold by
New England Compounding Center has raised serious questions about the regulation of
pharmacy compounding (Refs. 1 and 2).  Historically, regulation of pharmacy compounding has
focused on drawing a line between traditional pharmacy compounding and other manufacturing.
Generally, day-to-day oversight of traditional pharmacy compounding has been seen as the
primary responsibility of the States, which license pharmacies and regulate the practice of
pharmacy, while other manufacturing falls under the purview of FDA.  Going forward, FDA
believes the focus should be shifted from attempting to draw a bright line between traditional
pharmacy compounding and other manufacturing to clearly defining traditional pharmacy 4
compounding that should be primarily overseen by the States and higher risk non-traditional
pharmacy compounding that would require compliance with Federal standards.  In addition,
there are open questions about whether, and to what degree States should enforce Federal
standards, what that oversight should look like, and the appropriate level of communication and
coordination required to make the system of State and Federal oversight seamless and effective.
FDA recognizes that the States play a critical role in the oversight of traditional pharmacy
compounding, which can include compounding a customized medication in response to a
prescription by a licensed practitioner based on the identified medical need of a particular patient
for the compounded product.  However, a category of “non-traditional” compounding has
evolved in the last decade that FDA believes requires additional oversight.  The Agency is
working with Congress to consider new authorities regarding “non-traditional” compounding
pharmacies.  In recognition of the States’ role, FDA has also reached out to its State partners by
inviting representatives from all 50 States to an intergovernmental meeting.
II.  Questions for Comment
The intergovernmental meeting will be an opportunity for the State officials to discuss a
variety of issues regarding their views on the role of the FDA and the States in the oversight of
compounding including:
•  Given existing authorities and resources, are the States currently able to provide the needed
oversight of pharmacy compounding and consumer protection?
•  What should the Federal role be in regulating higher risk pharmacy compounding such as
compounding high-volumes of drugs for interstate distribution?  Is there a way to re-balance
Federal and State participation in the regulation of pharmacy compounding that would better 5
protect the public health? What strategies should be developed to further strengthen Federal/State
communications?
•  Do you see a role for the States in enforcing a Federal standard for “non-traditional”
compounding?  If so, what role?  What factors would affect a decision by your State to take on
such responsibility?
The public meeting announced in this document will be held after the intergovernmental
meeting described above.  FDA is holding this public meeting to share the results of the
intergovernmental meeting with interested stakeholders.  At the public meeting, FDA
representatives and participants from the intergovernmental meeting will summarize the results
of the intergovernmental meeting.  
III.  References
The following references have been placed on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and may be seen by interested persons between 9 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday. (FDA has verified the Web site addresses, but is not responsible
for any subsequent changes to the Web sites after this document publishes in the Federal
Register.)
1.  The Fungal Meningitis Outbreak: Could It Have Been Prevented? Statement of
Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D., before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce,
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
(http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Testimony/ucm327664.htm), November 14, 2012.
2.  Pharmacy Compounding: Implications of the 2012 Meningitis Outbreak:
Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D., before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 6
and Pensions (http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Testimony/ucm327667.htm), November
15, 2012.
Dated: November 21, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-28786 Filed 11/27/2012 at 8:45 am; Publication Date: 11/28/2012]