Showing posts with label Physician dispensing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Physician dispensing. Show all posts

Monday, August 12, 2013

Vermont Board of Pharmacy Unapproved Minutes for July 24, 2013 Board Meeting--Including a Discussion of Who Regulates Physician Who Dispensing


VERMONT BOARD OF PHARMACY – Unapproved Minutes
Secretary of State, Office of Professional Regulation
89 Main Street, 3
rd
 Floor, Montpelier, VT  05620-3402
July 24, 2013 at 9:00 A.M.
1. The meeting was called to order at 9:05 a.m.
 Members Present: Mr. Jeffrey Firlik, RPh, Chair; Ms. Julie A. Eaton, RPh, Vice-Chair; Ms. Judith
Wernecke, Public Member, Secretary; Mr. Steven M. Vincent, RPh; Mr. James Arisman, Esq.,
Public Member; and Mr. Larry Labor, RPh
 Members Absent: King Milne, RPh
OPR Personnel Present:  Mr. Larry S. Novins, Board Counsel; Mr. Ronald Klein RPh, Executive
Officer; and Ms. Aprille Morrison, Licensing Board Specialist.
Others Present:  Quincy Campbell, Mike Fish, Analesa Muir, Heather Shouldice, Sal Morana,
Rita Bagolini (by phone) and Dick Wilcox (by phone)
2. The Chair called for approval of the Minutes of the June 26, 2013 meeting as presented.  Mr.
Vincent made a motion to approve the minutes.  The motion was seconded by Ms. Eaton.
Motion passed.
3.  Hearings/Stipulations et al:
9:15 AM – Hearing – John Walters, Docket # 2013-213 – Motion for Continuance granted just
prior to meeting.
 
Mr. Klein presented an order for removal of conditions for Enosburg Pharmacy. Mr. Vincent
made a motion to accept the order.  The motion was seconded by Mr. Labor.  Motion passed.
Mr. Klein presented an order for removal of conditions for Corner Drug Co., Inc. and William
Aimi, RPh.  Ms. Eaton made a motion to table the request as the Board requires further
information regarding inspections.  The motion was seconded by Mr. Labor.  Motion passed.
5.  Guests:
 
 10:30 am – Heather Shouldice, VT Association of Chain Drug Stores – Clarification on Act 75.
Ms. Shouldice and Mike Fish from Hannaford’s Drug Stores addressed the Board regarding the
legislative requirements imposed on the Board regarding Act 75.  Mr. Novins stated the Board
should not be trying to interpret the intent of legislature as regards the additional prescription
requirements mandated by the legislation.  Ms. Shouldice will contact the chairman of the
Senate Judiciary Committee to request a meeting to discuss the intent of the legislature.     Ms.
Shouldice will also file a petition with the Board of Pharmacy seeking a declaratory judgment on
certain applicable parts of the legislation.    It is anticipated the Board will take up the petition at
its August meeting.
 11:00 AM – Sal Morana – Discussion with the Board regarding a proposal to consolidate the
drug purchasing for three hospitals.  Mr. Morana informed the Board the three hospitals are Board of Pharmacy   Page 2
looking to consolidate their drug purchasing in order to reduce costs and waste.  The Board
recommended that they register a separate entity as a distributor.
6.  Case Manager’s Report:
 Ms. Preston reported to the Board on the number of cases they currently have.  There are 33
cases, nine (9) ready for Investigative Team meeting, one (1) ready for closing, seven (7) are in
intake, seven (7) have had charges filed, four (4) are pending hearing, four (4) are under
investigation and one (1) is awaiting response.
7. Legislation/Rulemaking:
Legislative Updates:
A) Proposals for Statute Amendments:
• The Board discussed amending the statutes to give the Board the ability to require
certification of technicians.  The Board would like to require any individual who assists in
the preparation of a prescription to be nationally certified.  The Board discussed the
different categories they would like to have for technicians and their transition from noncertified to certified.  The Board has agreed they would like to request authority from
Legislature to require certification of technicians.
• Mr. Klein addressed the Board regarding the National Precursor Log Exchange (NPLEx)
called for in Act 75 passed by the 2013 Vermont General Assembly.  This online system
monitors the purchase of precursor chemicals and over the counter drugs used in the
illegal production of methamphetamine, a Schedule I controlled substance.    The system
acts to prevent the purchase of excessive quantities of these chemicals and drugs. In
small quantities, these over the counter drugs do have legitimate medical uses.   It
appears that neither the Vermont Prescription Monitoring System (VPMS) nor the
Vermont Board of Pharmacy have statutory authority to manage/monitor the
implementation and operation of the system.  The statutes requiring the implementation
and use of the NPLEx are in Department of Health Statutes.  Mr. Klein will contact the VT
Department of Health to try to get this straightened out and see if the Board of Pharmacy
needs to amend their regulations so as to manage the system.   Mr. Klein stated it may
be appropriate for the Board to request amendments to the statute at the next session of
the legislature.
• Definition for collaborative practice: a licensed pharmacist providing certain patient care
pursuant to rules adopted by the Board of Pharmacy under a written agreement with a
collaborating physician.
• Mr. Novins informed the Board of the additional licensure statuses that he would like to
see added to the statutes for all professions.  His proposal would allow there to be at
least three license statuses, active, inactive (per request) and lapsed/expired.  The Board
agreed that there should be additional licensure statuses added to statute.
• Ms. Eaton would like Mr. Klein to notify all prescribing Boards (Medical, Naturopathic
Physicians & Surgeons, Osteopathic Physicians, Dental Board, Midwives, Optometry and
Board of Veterinary Medicine) that according to Act 75 all written or type written
prescriptions for Schedule II, III and IV controlled substances must contain the quantity in
numeric and written out format. Board of Pharmacy   Page 3
 B) Rules Amendments and Revisions:
• The Board discussed return of unused drugs from nursing homes to a pharmacy for
resale and reimbursement.  The Board was under the understanding that this was
already allowable under federal regulations as long as the packaging was not tampered
with and they were not controlled substances.  They were also under the understanding
that as long as the medication was under the direction of a licensed professional (nurse,
physician, physician assistant or medical assistant) that it could be returned to a
pharmacy.  Mr. Klein does not know of any federal regulations that allow this.  Mr. Klein
asked the Board their thoughts regarding a cancer drug repository.  The Board felt this
was not a discussion they wanted to take up at this time, that there were too many
liabilities with retail pharmacies holding these.
• Mr. Vincent brought up the issue of physician dispensing.  The Board would like Mr. Klein